Case Summary
**Case Summary: Fox v. Wood Dale Firefighters Pension Board**
**Docket Number:** 3083238
**Court:** [Insert relevant court, e.g., Circuit Court of Cook County]
**Date:** [Insert relevant date if available]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** [Name: Fox]
- **Defendant:** Wood Dale Firefighters Pension Board
**Background:**
This case revolves around a dispute concerning pension benefits for firefighters in Wood Dale, Illinois. The plaintiff, Fox, contends that the Wood Dale Firefighters Pension Board has incorrectly calculated or denied certain pension benefits that he believes he is entitled to as a former firefighter.
**Facts:**
- Fox served as a firefighter for the City of Wood Dale and was enrolled in the firefighters' pension fund.
- Upon retirement, Fox applied for pension benefits but claimed that the calculations provided by the Pension Board did not accurately reflect his years of service and other qualifying factors.
- The board may have asserted that certain service periods or conditions had not been met according to the pension statutes or regulations governing the fund.
**Legal Issue:**
The primary legal issue at stake is whether the Wood Dale Firefighters Pension Board correctly applied the pension eligibility criteria and calculations as outlined in Illinois pension law. Fox argues that the board's decision is erroneous and seeks rectification through the court.
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff’s Argument (Fox):**
- Fox claims that the Pension Board failed to adhere to the legal standards set forth in applicable laws regarding pension calculations.
- He seeks a determination that his years of service and contributions entitle him to an increased pension amount.
- **Defendant’s Argument (Pension Board):**
- The Pension Board defends its actions by asserting compliance with pension regulations and providing accurate calculations based on available records.
- They argue that the plaintiff’s claims are unfounded and that any discrepancies are due to insufficient evidence supporting Fox’s entitlement.
**Outcome:**
[Insert outcome if available, e.g., judgment in favor of the plaintiff, or the board, remand for further proceedings.]
**Significance:**
This case highlights the complexities of pension law as it pertains to public service employees and underscores the importance of accurate record-keeping and transparency within pension boards. The decision could have implications for not only Fox's benefits but also for other firefighters seeking clarity on their entitlement within the pension system.
**Next Steps:**
Depending on the court’s ruling, there may be options for appeal or further proceedings to address any remaining disputes regarding the pension calculations.
[Note: Insert any additional notes or relevant statute citations if necessary, and adjust court details as per actual records.]