Legal Case Summary

Frank LaPena v. George Grigas


Date Argued: Wed May 16 2018
Case Number: 15-16154
Docket Number: 6733049
Judges:Wallace, N.R. Smith, Friedland
Duration: 36 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Frank Lapena v. George Grigas** **Docket Number:** 6733049 **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Date:** [Insert Date of Decision] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** Frank Lapena - **Defendant:** George Grigas **Background:** The case of Frank Lapena v. George Grigas involves a civil dispute stemming from [briefly describe the nature of the dispute, e.g., contract breach, personal injury, etc.]. Frank Lapena, the plaintiff, alleges that George Grigas, the defendant, has [summarize the plaintiff's claims against the defendant, including relevant facts and context]. **Facts:** 1. The plaintiff, Frank Lapena, claims that [provide key facts establishing the context of the case, including dates, events, and actions taken by both parties]. 2. The defendant, George Grigas, contends that [summarize the defense's arguments and any counterclaims, if applicable]. 3. [Mention any relevant evidence or witnesses that were presented during the proceedings.] **Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case include: - [List the main legal questions that the court had to decide, such as liability, damages, or specific legal interpretations.] - [Include any procedural matters, if relevant.] **Ruling:** The court ruled in favor of [plaintiff or defendant], finding that [summarize the court's reasoning and the conclusion it reached regarding the issues presented]. The court concluded that [mention any specific statutes, regulations, or case law that were cited in the ruling]. **Outcome:** - The court awarded [insert any damages awarded, injunctions, or other remedies granted to the prevailing party]. - [Briefly outline any additional orders or stipulations made by the court.] **Significance:** This case is significant because [discuss the broader implications of the ruling, such as its impact on similar cases, legal precedents set, or changes in legal interpretation]. **Conclusion:** Frank Lapena v. George Grigas illustrates [summarize the key takeaways from the case and its relevance to the legal landscape]. The case underscores the importance of [mention any particular legal principles or considerations that emerged from the ruling]. (Note: This summary is a fictional representation and should be tailored with actual case details if available.)

Frank LaPena v. George Grigas


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available