Case Summary
**Case Summary: Frederick Allen v. Roy Cooper**
**Docket Number**: 6340781
**Court**: [Specify the court if known, e.g., Superior Court of North Carolina]
**Date**: [Specify the date of filing or judgment if known]
**Parties Involved**:
- **Plaintiff**: Frederick Allen
- **Defendant**: Roy Cooper, in his official capacity as Governor of North Carolina
**Background**:
Frederick Allen filed a lawsuit against Roy Cooper, the Governor of North Carolina. The nature of the dispute typically involves issues such as constitutional rights, state actions, or specific policies enacted by the governor that the plaintiff contends are unlawful or violate his rights.
**Claims**:
1. **Constitutional Violations**: Allen argued that certain actions or policies implemented by Governor Cooper infringe upon his constitutional rights. Specific violations could involve the First Amendment (freedom of speech), the Fourteenth Amendment (due process), or other relevant statutes.
2. **Injunction/Relief Sought**: Allen sought a legal remedy, which may include an injunction against the enforcement of certain state policies or actions that he views as detrimental or unlawful.
**Proceedings**:
Details of the procedural history, including motions filed, responses from the defendant, or any hearings that took place, may provide insight into how the case progressed through the court system.
**Outcome**:
The resolution of the case, whether it resulted in a ruling in favor of Allen, Cooper, or a dismissal, is critical. Summaries typically highlight any legal precedents established, monetary damages awarded, or injunctions granted.
**Significance**:
This case may set an important precedent regarding the balance of state authority versus individual rights, especially in the context of governmental powers during emergencies (e.g., during public health crises).
**Conclusion**:
Frederick Allen v. Roy Cooper addresses key legal issues surrounding governmental authority and individual rights, reflecting ongoing debates in constitutional law. The ruling in this case could have implications for similar future cases and the interpretation of constitutional protections in state governance.
---
*Please note that specific details such as dates, legal claims, and outcomes should be filled in accordingly based on actual case documents or court records, as this summary is a general template.*