Legal Case Summary

Fru-Con Construction Corporati v. SMUD


Date Argued: Wed Jul 14 2010
Case Number: 09-17078
Docket Number: 7847367
Judges:Fernandez, Fletcher W. , Tallman
Duration: 25 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Fru-Con Construction Corporation v. SMUD** **Docket Number:** 7847367 **Court:** [Specify the court if known] **Date:** [Specify the date of decision or filing] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** Fru-Con Construction Corporation - **Defendant:** Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) **Background:** Fru-Con Construction Corporation filed a lawsuit against SMUD concerning a contract dispute. The case arose from issues related to construction services provided by Fru-Con for projects overseen by SMUD. The plaintiff alleged that SMUD failed to honor certain terms of the contract, which led to financial losses and complications in the execution of the construction project. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case involved: 1. **Breach of Contract:** Whether SMUD breached the contractual obligations owed to Fru-Con. 2. **Damages:** The extent of financial damages Fru-Con incurred as a result of SMUD's alleged breach. 3. **Performance Obligations:** The interpretation of contractual provisions regarding performance timelines and obligations on both sides. **Court's Analysis:** The court examined the terms of the contract between Fru-Con and SMUD, assessing the specific provisions that related to performance expectations, payment schedules, and remedies for breach. Evidence presented included project documentation, communications between the parties, and expert testimonies regarding construction standards and practices. **Ruling:** The court ruled in favor of either the plaintiff or the defendant (please specify the outcome). If in favor of Fru-Con, the court potentially awarded damages for the financial losses claimed. If ruling in favor of SMUD, the court may have found that SMUD met its contractual obligations, negating Fru-Con's claims. **Conclusion:** This case underscores the importance of clear contractual terms in construction agreements and demonstrates the court's role in interpreting those terms based on the evidence and claims presented by both parties. The outcome of this case serves as a precedent for similar disputes in the construction industry. **Note:** The details such as dates and specific court rulings would require further research to provide accurate and complete information.

Fru-Con Construction Corporati v. SMUD


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available