Case Summary
**Case Summary: Frunz v. City of Tacoma**
**Docket Number: 7855717**
**Court:** [Specify the court if known, e.g., Superior Court, Washington State]
**Date Filed:** [Insert the date if known]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Frunz
- **Defendant:** City of Tacoma
**Background:**
The case of Frunz v. City of Tacoma involves a dispute that arises from [briefly outline the nature of the case, e.g., a personal injury claim, a civil rights issue, zoning dispute, etc.]. The Plaintiff, Frunz, alleges that the City of Tacoma [describe the actions or omissions by the city that led to the lawsuit, e.g., negligence, failure to uphold city ordinances, violation of constitutional rights, etc.].
**Facts of the Case:**
- On [insert relevant date(s)], Frunz [detail any specific events that led to the dispute].
- It is asserted that [include any key facts or evidence presented by the plaintiff, such as incidents, city policies, communications, etc.].
- The City of Tacoma responded by [outline any defenses or responses raised by the city, including any motions to dismiss, affirmative defenses, or counterclaims].
**Legal Issues:**
The primary legal issues in this case involve:
1. [Identify the first significant legal issue, e.g., whether the city was negligent in maintaining public safety standards].
2. [Identify the second issue, e.g., the application of specific statutes or municipal codes].
3. [Any other relevant legal questions].
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff's Arguments:**
- Frunz argues that [summarize the plaintiff’s arguments, including references to relevant laws or precedents].
- **Defendant's Arguments:**
- The City of Tacoma contends that [summarize the defendant’s arguments, defenses, and any legal principles cited in support of their position].
**Outcome:**
[If the case has a concluded judgment, summarize the court's decision, findings, or orders. If the case is ongoing, provide the current status, including any scheduled hearings or motions pending.]
**Significance:**
This case highlights important issues regarding [mention why this case is significant, including any implications for local governance, public safety, civil rights, etc.]. It may set precedents for [describe possible future implications for similar cases or city policies].
**Conclusion:**
Frunz v. City of Tacoma represents a pivotal legal battle between an individual and municipal authority, raising critical questions about [summarize key takeaways on legal standards, public responsibility, etc.].
(Note: Please provide more specific details if available to fill in the placeholders regarding the case facts, legal arguments, and outcome.)