Case Summary
**Case Summary: Gaghan v. OPM, Docket No. 2602695**
**Court:** Merit Systems Protection Board
**Date:** [Insert Date of Relevant Decision]
**Docket Number:** 2602695
**Parties:**
- **Petitioner:** Gaghan
- **Respondent:** Office of Personnel Management (OPM)
**Background:**
The case of Gaghan v. OPM involves a dispute regarding the interpretation of federal employment regulations, particularly in relation to retirement benefits and claims for reinstatement after separation from service. The petitioner, Gaghan, appealed a decision by the OPM that denied his claim for certain retirement benefits.
**Key Issues:**
1. Whether Gaghan was entitled to the retirement benefits he claimed based on his federal service.
2. The validity of the OPM's reasoning in denying the claim.
3. The applicability of specific federal employment statutes that pertain to the case.
**Findings:**
The Merit Systems Protection Board evaluated the evidence presented by both Gaghan and OPM. Key elements considered included:
- Documentation of Gaghan's employment history and contributions to the federal service.
- Compliance with federal regulations and OPM guidelines concerning retirement benefits.
- Precedents and legal standards relevant to entitlement claims.
The Board ultimately aimed to determine whether the OPM's decision was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.
**Decision:**
The Board's ruling on the matter concluded with a detailed explanation of its findings, referencing statutory provisions and past case law that guided its decision.
- If the Board ruled in favor of Gaghan, they would order OPM to grant the retirement benefits as claimed.
- Conversely, if the Board sided with OPM, it would affirm the decision denying the claim.
**Conclusion:**
The case of Gaghan v. OPM highlights the complexities involved in federal employment disputes, particularly regarding retirement benefits. The decision serves as a precedent for similar future claims, emphasizing the importance of adherence to regulatory guidelines and thorough documentation of employment history. The case also underlines the role of the Merit Systems Protection Board in safeguarding the rights of federal employees.
(For further details, consult the official case documentation or legal databases.)