Legal Case Summary

Garry Carroll v. Continental Automotive


Date Argued: Tue Jan 24 2017
Case Number: 16-1152
Docket Number: 4573289
Judges:J. Harvie Wilkinson III, James A. Wynn, Jr., Henry F. Floyd
Duration: 28 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Garry Carroll v. Continental Automotive** **Docket Number:** 4573289 **Court:** [Specify the Court, e.g., United States District Court, [District Name] or State Court Name] **Filing Date:** [Include Date] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** Garry Carroll - **Defendant:** Continental Automotive **Background:** Garry Carroll filed a lawsuit against Continental Automotive, alleging [briefly outline the nature of the complaint, e.g., wrongful termination, discrimination, breach of contract, product liability, etc.]. The plaintiff claims that [summarize the allegations and the context of the case, e.g., he was subjected to discriminatory practices, suffered damages due to a defective product, etc.]. **Key Facts:** - The events leading to the lawsuit began on [insert date or relevant timeline]. - Carroll asserts that [elaborate on specific incidents, such as duration of employment, the nature of the alleged misconduct, key evidence supporting the claim]. - Continental Automotive responded to the claims, arguing that [summarize the defense’s position and any key defenses raised]. **Legal Issues:** The case raises several legal issues, including: 1. [Issue 1: e.g., whether the termination was justified or constituted discrimination under applicable laws]. 2. [Issue 2: e.g., whether the warranty terms of the product were violated]. 3. [Additional legal issues as applicable]. **Procedural Posture:** The case is currently at [indicate the stage of the proceedings, e.g., pre-trial, trial, post-trial motions, or on appeal]. The parties have engaged in [mention discovery, settlement discussions, motion practice if relevant]. **Current Status:** As of the latest filings, [outline any motions filed, court orders, or relevant developments in the case, e.g., a motion to dismiss, summary judgment motions, etc.]. **Potential Outcomes:** The resolution of this case could result in [summarize potential outcomes such as monetary damages, reinstatement, changes in company policies, etc.]. **Conclusion:** The outcome of Garry Carroll v. Continental Automotive will have implications for [mention any broader implications, such as employee rights, corporate responsibilities, consumer protection laws, etc.]. [Note: Ensure that all details are accurate and tailored to the specifics of the case as documented in public records, as this summary is a template and may require adjustment to reflect the actual case facts and legal context.]

Garry Carroll v. Continental Automotive


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available