Legal Case Summary

Gaudencio Garcia-Celestino v. Consolidated Citrus Limited Partnership


Date Argued: Tue Apr 17 2018
Case Number: 17-12866
Docket Number: 7807135
Judges:Not available
Duration: 25 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Gaudencio Garcia-Celestino v. Consolidated Citrus Limited Partnership** **Docket Number:** 7807135 **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida] **Filing Date:** [Insert Filing Date] **Case Summary:** In the matter of Gaudencio Garcia-Celestino v. Consolidated Citrus Limited Partnership, the plaintiff, Gaudencio Garcia-Celestino, initiated legal proceedings against his employer, Consolidated Citrus Limited Partnership, alleging violations of labor laws and seeking redress for workplace grievances. **Facts:** Gaudencio Garcia-Celestino claimed that while employed with Consolidated Citrus Limited Partnership, he experienced various forms of mistreatment, including unsafe working conditions, unpaid overtime, and discriminatory practices. He contended that these actions constituted violations of both state and federal labor regulations, including the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The plaintiff provided evidence of his employment, work hours, and the nature of the alleged violations, while the defendant countered that the claims were unfounded and that appropriate measures were taken to maintain compliance with labor standards. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues involved: 1. Whether Garcia-Celestino was entitled to overtime pay under the FLSA. 2. Whether Consolidated Citrus Limited Partnership failed to provide a safe working environment as mandated by relevant regulations. 3. The validity of the discrimination claims based on workplace treatment and conditions. **Ruling:** [Insert ruling or decision by the court, including any judgments, settlements, or outcomes, if available.] **Implications:** The case highlights important issues related to workers' rights, employer obligations under the FLSA, and the enforcement of workplace safety standards. It underscores the necessity for employers to adhere to labor laws and ensure equitable treatment of employees to avoid potential litigation. **Conclusion:** Gaudencio Garcia-Celestino's case against Consolidated Citrus Limited Partnership serves as a critical reminder of the legal protections available to workers and the importance of compliance with labor regulations. The outcome of this case may influence future employer practices and employee awareness of their rights within the workplace. [Note: For accurate and comprehensive details including rulings and specific dates, it may be necessary to reference actual court documents or legal databases.]

Gaudencio Garcia-Celestino v. Consolidated Citrus Limited Partnership


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available