Legal Case Summary

Giddings v. Joseph Coleman Center


Date Argued: Wed Jun 10 2009
Case Number: 146440
Docket Number: 2601344
Judges:Not available
Duration: 37 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Giddings v. Joseph Coleman Center, Docket Number 2601344** **Court:** [Specify Court if known, e.g., Superior Court, State Court, etc.] **Date:** [Specify Judgment Date, if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Giddings - **Defendant:** Joseph Coleman Center **Background:** The case involves a legal dispute between Giddings and the Joseph Coleman Center. While specific details about the nature of the dispute are not provided, cases of this nature often revolve around issues such as employment disputes, personal injury claims, or contractual disagreements. **Facts:** 1. Giddings filed a complaint against the Joseph Coleman Center, alleging [briefly describe the nature of the allegations, e.g., discrimination, wrongful termination, negligence, breach of contract, etc.]. 2. The Joseph Coleman Center responded to the allegations, providing their side of the story which included [summary of the defense’s position]. 3. Relevant evidence was presented to support both parties' claims, which may have included testimonies, documents, and other material relevant to the case. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case involve [identify key legal issues, such as violation of specific laws, interpretation of contracts, liability determinations, etc.]. The court was tasked with determining whether the actions of the Joseph Coleman Center constituted a violation of the applicable legal standards. **Court’s Decision:** The court rendered its decision on [specify date]. The judgment included [briefly outline the decision, e.g., ruling in favor of Giddings, dismissing the case, awarding damages, etc.]. The court’s reasoning was based on [summarize the rationale for the decision, referencing any laws or precedents that were significant to the case]. **Impact:** This case has implications for [describe the broader impact of the decision, such as its effect on similar cases, the parties involved, or its importance in the context of the law]. **Conclusion:** The Giddings v. Joseph Coleman Center case reinforces important legal principles regarding [identify key legal principles discussed in the decision]. The case serves as a significant reference point for future disputes of a similar nature. **Note:** The summary above is based on typical legal case formats. Specific details regarding the court’s decision, factual background, and legal arguments would ideally need to be gathered from actual court records or filings related to the case number 2601344.

Giddings v. Joseph Coleman Center


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available