Legal Case Summary

Gina Burkhead v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co


Date Argued: Mon Nov 16 2015
Case Number: 17913
Docket Number: 3013331
Judges:McKeown, Rawlinson, Davis
Duration: 32 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Gina Burkhead v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.** **Docket Number:** 3013331 **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., District Court, State of [State]] **Date of Filing:** [Insert Filing Date] **Key Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** Gina Burkhead - **Defendant:** Stewart Title Guaranty Co. **Background:** This case involves a dispute arising from a title insurance policy issued by Stewart Title Guaranty Co. to Gina Burkhead. The plaintiff claims that she suffered financial damages due to defects in the title of her property, which she believes should have been covered under the insurance policy. **Facts:** 1. Gina Burkhead purchased a property and obtained a title insurance policy from Stewart Title Guaranty Co. 2. Following the purchase, it was discovered that there were existing claims against the title that rendered it defective. 3. Burkhead sought to have the title insurance cover the claims but contends that Stewart Title Guaranty Co. denied her claim based on policy exclusions or other assertions. 4. As a result of the denial, Burkhead faced significant financial consequences, including potential loss of the property or the expense of legal action to clear the title. **Legal Issues:** - Whether Stewart Title Guaranty Co. is liable for the financial losses incurred by Burkhead due to the title defects. - Interpretation of the title insurance policy provisions regarding coverage exclusions and obligations of the insurer. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Burkhead argues that the title insurance should have covered the defects, and Stewart Title Guaranty Co. failed to honor its contractual obligations, thereby causing her financial harm. - **Defendant's Argument:** Stewart Title Guaranty Co. may argue that the claims are not covered under the policy terms or that Burkhead did not comply with necessary conditions precedent to coverage. **Outcome:** [If the case has been resolved, specify the outcome, including any judgments or settlements. If not concluded, mention that the case is ongoing and any scheduled hearings or trial dates.] **Significance:** This case emphasizes the importance of understanding title insurance policies and the obligations of insurers to their clients. The outcome may influence future title insurance claims and the interpretation of policy coverage. --- Please note, for a more detailed analysis, additional specifics from the case would be necessary, including the jurisdiction and any relevant legal precedents or statutes invoked.

Gina Burkhead v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available