Legal Case Summary

Glazer Capital Mgt v. Magistri


Date Argued: Fri Jun 13 2008
Case Number: 06-16899
Docket Number: 7852040
Judges:Wallace, Graber, Schiavelli
Duration: 35 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Glazer Capital Management v. Magri, Docket No. 7852040** **Court:** [Specify the court if known] **Date:** [Specify the date of the decision if known] **Judges:** [If available] **Parties:** - Plaintiff: Glazer Capital Management - Defendant: Magri **Background:** This case involves a dispute between Glazer Capital Management (the Plaintiff) and Magri (the Defendant). The Plaintiff, a financial management firm, alleges that the Defendant breached a fiduciary duty, thereby resulting in financial losses. The case revolves around the fiduciary duties that are typically expected in financial management and the implications of a breach of such duties. The specific actions or omissions that led to the breach are central to the Plaintiff's claims. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case include: 1. Whether the Defendant had a fiduciary duty towards the Plaintiff. 2. Whether the Defendant breached that duty. 3. Whether the Plaintiff suffered damages as a direct result of the Defendant’s actions. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Glazer Capital Management argues that the Defendant failed to act in the best interest of the firm and that such negligence led to significant financial damages. The Plaintiff seeks compensation for these damages and possibly punitive damages to deter future breaches. - **Defendant's Argument:** Magri contends that there was no fiduciary obligation and that any alleged breach did not occur. The Defendant may also argue that the Plaintiff did not adequately prove the extent of the damages claimed. **Ruling:** [To be filled in with the court's ruling, if available] **Conclusion:** This case underscores the importance of fiduciary duties in financial management and the legal repercussions of breaching those duties. The outcome will likely have implications for the standards of conduct expected in similar financial relationships. **Notes:** - Further details such as specific legal precedents cited, evidentiary rulings, or procedural history may provide additional context. - Review any available opinions or orders from the court to understand the implications of the ruling. **Disclaimer:** This summary is based on the information available and may not include all facts or legal intricacies. It is advisable to consult legal documents or an attorney for a comprehensive understanding of the case.

Glazer Capital Mgt v. Magistri


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available