Case Summary
**Case Summary: Glazing Health & Welfare Fund v. Michael A. Lamek**
**Docket Number:** 6226175
**Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., District Court of [Jurisdiction]]
**Date:** [Specify Date]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Glazing Health & Welfare Fund
- **Defendant:** Michael A. Lamek
**Background:**
The Glazing Health & Welfare Fund initiated legal proceedings against Michael A. Lamek regarding issues related to health and welfare benefits. The Fund, which provides various health and welfare benefits to eligible participants, alleges that Lamek failed to fulfill obligations associated with the agreed-upon contributions or benefits coordination.
**Facts of the Case:**
1. The Glazing Health & Welfare Fund is a benefit plan created to provide health-related benefits to employees within the glazing industry.
2. Lamek was an employee covered under this benefit plan and was expected to contribute to the fund according to the terms set forth in the governing agreements.
3. The Fund claims that Lamek either did not contribute the required amounts or improperly received benefits, leading to financial discrepancies that necessitated legal action.
4. The dispute centers around the interpretation of the contractual obligations related to contributions and benefit distribution under the Fund’s terms.
**Legal Issues:**
- Whether Michael A. Lamek was in violation of the terms of the health and welfare benefit plan.
- The validity of the claims made by the Fund regarding unpaid contributions and benefit disbursements.
- Possible defenses that Lamek may offer in response to the Fund's claims.
**Arguments:**
- The Glazing Health & Welfare Fund argues that it has the right to collect unpaid contributions and that Lamek's actions have resulted in financial harm to the plan.
- Lamek may contend that he complied with all relevant obligations or may raise defenses regarding the Fund’s claims, potentially challenging the Fund’s calculations or alleged violations.
**Outcome:**
[To be filled in based on the court’s ruling or settlement if applicable. Include details about the judgment, any penalties imposed, or further actions required by either party.]
**Conclusion:**
This case illustrates the complexities surrounding health and welfare benefit plans, particularly in terms of contribution obligations and the administration of benefits. The outcome of the case will likely set a precedent regarding the enforcement of contribution terms and the accountability of employees under such plans.
**Note:** For specific details regarding the court's decision, additional facts, and implications, please refer to the official court documents or legal databases.