Legal Case Summary

Glen-Davis v. City of Oakland


Date Argued: Wed Feb 16 2005
Case Number: 03-16170
Docket Number: 7858539
Judges:Alarcon, Siler , Silverman
Duration: 27 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Glen Davis v. City of Oakland** **Docket Number:** 7858539 **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Date:** [Insert Date] **Overview:** Glen Davis filed a case against the City of Oakland, challenging certain actions taken by the city that Davis claims violated his rights. The case centers around allegations related to [specific issues, e.g., wrongful termination, ordinance enforcement, etc.], and the plaintiff seeks [specific relief sought, e.g., monetary damages, reinstatement, etc.]. **Facts:** - Glen Davis was [provide relevant background about the plaintiff, such as employment status with the city, any relevant personal history, etc.]. - The City of Oakland [describe the actions taken by the city that prompted the lawsuit, such as policy changes, enforcement of certain laws, etc.]. - [Mention any relevant incidents leading up to the filing of the lawsuit, including dates and descriptions of events that are pertinent to the case.] **Legal Issues:** - The primary legal issues in this case include [list the legal claims raised by Davis, such as violations of constitutional rights, discrimination, failure to comply with city laws, etc.]. - The case also raises questions regarding [mention any additional legal principles involved, such as municipal liability, procedural due process, etc.]. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Glen Davis argues that [summarize the main points of Davis's argument, including any evidence or legal precedents he relies upon]. - **Defendant's Argument:** The City of Oakland contends that [outline the city's defense, explaining its rationale and any legal justifications provided to dismiss the claims]. **Status:** - The case is currently [indicate the current status, such as awaiting trial, pending a motion to dismiss, etc.]. - [Include any key dates, such as hearing dates, deadlines for filings, or other procedural milestones.] **Conclusion:** Glen Davis v. City of Oakland represents a significant case concerning [summarize the broader implications of the case, such as impacts on city policy, community, or legal precedent]. The court’s decision will likely have repercussions for [describe who will be affected by the outcome, e.g., employees, residents, other municipalities]. **Note:** [Include any important notes on the case, such as ongoing negotiations or settlement discussions if applicable.] **Next Steps:** - [Outline the next steps in the litigation process, including upcoming hearings or deadlines.] Please ensure to verify any specific details required for this summary, including court names and dates, as this information is context-dependent and may vary.

Glen-Davis v. City of Oakland


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available