Case Summary
**Case Summary: Global Technology & Trading, Inc. v. Satyam Computer Services Limited (Docket No. 2660390)**
**Court:** [Specific Court Name or Jurisdiction]
**Date Filed:** [Filing Date]
**Case Number:** 2660390
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Global Technology & Trading, Inc.
- **Defendant:** Satyam Computer Services Limited
**Background:**
Global Technology & Trading, Inc. (hereinafter "Plaintiff") filed a lawsuit against Satyam Computer Services Limited (hereinafter "Defendant") concerning allegations of breach of contract, misrepresentation, and other related claims. The Plaintiff, a technology trading and consulting firm, claimed that the Defendant, an Indian multinational IT services company, failed to deliver on contractual obligations which included software development and IT services.
**Key Facts:**
- The Plaintiff and Defendant entered into a contractual agreement for the provision of IT services.
- The Plaintiff alleges that the Defendant failed to meet certain key performance metrics as defined in the contract.
- The Plaintiff claims that due to the Defendant's alleged shortcomings, it suffered significant financial losses.
- The Plaintiff sought damages for lost profits due to the delays and non-performance, along with other consequential damages.
**Legal Issues:**
- Breach of Contract: Whether the Defendant failed to perform its contractual obligations.
- Misrepresentation: Whether the Defendant made false representations that induced the Plaintiff to enter into the contract.
- Liability: The extent of the Defendant's responsibility for the alleged damages suffered by the Plaintiff.
**Court Proceedings:**
The case proceeded through various stages including pleadings, discovery, and possibly pre-trial motions. Both parties presented their arguments regarding the validity of the contract, the performance obligations, and the nature of the alleged damages.
**Outcome:**
[Insert outcome here if known, e.g., "The court ruled in favor of the Plaintiff, awarding damages" or "The court dismissed the case based on lack of evidence."]
**Significance:**
This case highlights the complexities involved in international technology contracts, the importance of clear performance metrics in service agreements, and the legal ramifications of misrepresentation in business dealings.
**Note:**
This summary presents a high-level overview of the case and does not encompass all legal details or proceedings. Specific outcomes, citations, or judicial commentary may require further legal documentation or research.
---
This summary is designed to provide a concise understanding of the case's essential elements without assuming prior knowledge of legal terminology. If you want to delve deeper into specific legal aspects, feel free to ask!