Legal Case Summary

Grant Romaine v. City of Poulsbo


Date Argued: Fri Jun 10 2011
Case Number: 10-35644
Docket Number: 7845564
Judges:Reinhardt, Fletcher W. , Rawlinson
Duration: 30 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Grant Romaine v. City of Poulsbo** **Docket Number:** 7845564 **Court:** [Specify the court if known, e.g., Washington State Superior Court] **Date of Filing:** [Insert filing date if known] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** Grant Romaine - **Defendant:** City of Poulsbo **Background:** Grant Romaine initiated a legal action against the City of Poulsbo, citing grievances that are not fully detailed in the available documentation. Typically, such cases could involve claims of improper conduct by city officials, disputes regarding zoning or land use decisions, or challenges to municipal regulations. **Legal Issues:** The case may encompass various legal issues such as: - Allegations of negligence or violation of municipal codes. - Claims for damages due to actions taken by the city that Romaine argues are unlawful or unjust. - Possible civil rights implications if the case involves discrimination or the infringement of Romaine's rights by the city. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Case (Romaine):** The plaintiff is likely arguing that the City of Poulsbo's actions or inactions directly resulted in harm or damage to him. Details on the specific legal grounds (e.g., violation of constitutional rights, statutory violations) need to be outlined. - **Defendant's Case (City of Poulsbo):** The city would generally assert defenses based on the legality of their actions, adherence to applicable laws, and possibly the claim of sovereign immunity. **Outcome:** As of the current knowledge cutoff, the outcome of the case, including any judgment or settlement, is not specified. It is essential to check case law databases or court records for the latest developments, including any significant rulings or motions filed. **Significance:** The case may set a precedent for future disputes between citizens and municipal governments in terms of governmental accountability and citizens' rights. The legal interpretations emerging from this case could influence how cities operate and respond to citizen complaints or grievances. **Next Steps:** Further actions include monitoring court proceedings for any resolutions, reviewing additional legal briefs filed by both parties, and analyzing the implications of the case on local governance. **Note:** For more comprehensive details, including court findings, specific legal claims, and the precise context of the dispute, consultation of legal databases or court documents would be necessary.

Grant Romaine v. City of Poulsbo


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available