Case Summary
**Case Summary: Gregg v. Superintendent Rockview SCI**
**Docket Number:** 2592478
**Court:** Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court
**Date:** [Insert Date]
**Overview:**
Gregg v. Superintendent Rockview SCI is a legal case involving a petitioner, [Petitioner's Full Name], who challenged the actions of the Superintendent of the State Correctional Institution at Rockview (SCI Rockview). The case primarily deals with issues related to the conditions of confinement, procedural due process, and the application of institutional regulations affecting inmates.
**Background:**
The petitioner was an inmate at SCI Rockview and sought relief from certain conditions or decisions made by the prison administration. The circumstances leading to the case involved allegations of improper treatment, including issues related to confinement conditions, administrative procedures, or disciplinary actions taken against the petitioner.
The petitioner claimed that their rights were violated under the Pennsylvania Constitution, relevant statutes, and policy guidelines governing the administration of prisons. This included challenges to specific disciplinary measures that the petitioner argued were unfair or improperly administered.
**Legal Issues:**
1. **Due Process:** Whether the petitioner was afforded proper due process protections during the disciplinary proceedings and whether the procedures followed were consistent with legal standards.
2. **Conditions of Confinement:** Examination of whether the conditions of confinement violated the petitioner's rights, potentially constituting cruel and unusual punishment or other violations of constitutional protections.
3. **Administrative Regulation Compliance:** Evaluation of whether the actions taken by the Superintendent complied with institutional policies and state laws.
**Court's Findings:**
The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court reviewed the evidence presented, including the petitioner’s claims, the Superintendent's response, and relevant legal precedents. The court assessed the procedural fairness applied during the disciplinary actions and examined the conditions cited by the petitioner.
**Outcome:**
The court issued a ruling, determining whether the actions of the Superintendent were justified, adhered to due process requirements, and met constitutional standards regarding the conditions of confinement. Depending on the findings, the petitioner may have received remedies such as modification of conditions, reinstatement of privileges, or other forms of relief.
**Conclusion:**
The case of Gregg v. Superintendent Rockview SCI illustrates the ongoing legal debates and considerations surrounding inmates’ rights and the administration of correctional facilities. It underscores the importance of procedural fairness and humane treatment in the context of incarceration.
**Note:** For detailed legal provisions, counsel representation, and specific dates, refer to the case file and court documentation.