Legal Case Summary

Gregory Powell v. D. Runnels


Date Argued: Wed Jul 09 2014
Case Number: 12-15608
Docket Number: 7836147
Judges:Fernandez, Smith, Christen
Duration: 14 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Gregory Powell v. D. Runnels** **Docket Number:** 7836147 **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., U.S. District Court, [Jurisdiction/State]] **Date:** [Specify Date of Decision] ### **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Gregory Powell - **Defendant:** D. Runnels ### **Background:** Gregory Powell filed a petition against D. Runnels, claiming **[briefly state the nature of the claim, e.g., violation of constitutional rights, conditions of confinement, etc.]**. The case arose during Powell's incarceration [provide relevant details about the time frame or context of incarceration]. ### **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case include: 1. **[State key legal issue #1, e.g., alleged violation of rights under the Eighth Amendment, if applicable]** 2. **[State key legal issue #2, e.g., failure to provide adequate medical care or other constitutional issues]** ### **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Arguments:** - Powell asserted that **[summarize main arguments or claims made by Powell, including specific incidents or evidence cited]**. He argued that **[specifically mention any laws or constitutional rights he claimed were violated]**. - **Defendant’s Arguments:** - D. Runnels' defense contended that **[summarize main counterarguments or defenses raised; for example, asserting compliance with applicable laws, procedural defenses, etc.]**. Runnels claimed that **[mention any justifications or rationales for their actions that were presented]**. ### **Court’s Analysis:** In its ruling, the court evaluated: - **The evidence presented**, including testimonies, documents, and previous case law. - **[Key findings by the court regarding the credibility of evidence or parties’ claims]**. - **[Any procedural issues that may have influenced the court's decision]**. ### **Conclusion:** The court ultimately ruled in favor of **[state whether the court ruled for Powell or Runnels, and summarize the outcome, e.g., dismissal of the case, granting or denying of a motion, etc.]**. **[If applicable, mention any orders for further action, such as remanding the case, ordering relief, etc.]** ### **Significance:** This case highlights **[discuss any broader implications or significance related to the case, such as impact on inmates' rights, court precedents, or procedural interpretations]**. **Note:** The specifics regarding the actual arguments, court analysis, and decision can vary based on full case details, which were not provided. Be sure to include factual accuracy and the specifics of the case for a comprehensive understanding.

Gregory Powell v. D. Runnels


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available