Legal Case Summary

Grussmark v. GlaxoSmithKline


Date Argued: Tue May 02 2006
Case Number: 2013AP001485-D
Docket Number: 2605146
Judges:Not available
Duration: 34 minutes
Court Name: Federal Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Grussmark v. GlaxoSmithKline, Docket Number 2605146** **Court:** [Insert relevant court, e.g., U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York] **Filing Date:** [Insert filing date if available] **Decision Date:** [Insert decision date if available] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** [Insert Plaintiff's name, e.g., William Grussmark] - **Defendant:** GlaxoSmithKline **Background:** The case of Grussmark v. GlaxoSmithKline centers around allegations made by the plaintiff, William Grussmark, against GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), a major pharmaceutical company. The plaintiff alleged that GSK had engaged in [describe the nature of the allegations, e.g., false advertising, failure to warn, product liability, etc.]. The plaintiff claimed damages due to [insert specific harm claimed by the plaintiff, e.g., health issues caused by a medication, financial losses due to misleading marketing practices, etc.]. **Legal Issues:** The main legal issues in this case include: 1. Whether GSK was liable for [insert main allegations, e.g., product defects, misleading conduct, etc.]. 2. The adequacy of the warnings provided by GSK regarding their products. 3. [Any other legal questions pertinent to the case.] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Arguments:** The plaintiff argued that GSK’s actions were [insert key points of the plaintiff's arguments, e.g., negligent, fraudulent, etc.], leading to [describe the specific harms suffered by the plaintiff]. As such, the plaintiff sought [insert the type of relief sought, e.g., compensatory damages, punitive damages, etc.]. - **Defendant’s Arguments:** GSK contended that [insert defense arguments, e.g., the product in question was safe, warnings were sufficient, no causal link between actions and harms, etc.]. The defense argued that they had acted within industry standards and complied with regulatory requirements. **Court’s Decision:** The court ruled in favor of [insert which party the court ruled in favor of, e.g., the plaintiff or the defendant], finding that [summarize the court's findings, any key legal precedents cited, and rationale for the decision]. The court concluded that [insert summary of the decision outcome, including any damages awarded or actions ordered, or if the case was dismissed]. **Conclusion:** This case serves as an important reference for future cases involving [insert relevant implications for the law or industry, e.g., pharmaceutical advertising, product liability, etc.]. The ruling underscores [insert key lessons or legal principles established by the case]. **Legal Representation:** - **Plaintiff’s Counsel:** [Insert attorney's name or law firm] - **Defendant’s Counsel:** [Insert attorney's name or law firm] **Status:** [Include any information about appeals or current status of the case, if known.] (Note: This summary is a fictional representation based on the provided case name and docket number. Please verify with actual case documents and legal resources for accurate and detailed information.)

Grussmark v. GlaxoSmithKline


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available