Legal Case Summary

Gypsum Resources, LLC v. Catherine Masto


Date Argued: Tue Mar 15 2011
Case Number: 09-17849
Docket Number: 7846148
Judges:Paez, Berzon, Bea
Duration: 36 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Gypsum Resources, LLC v. Catherine Masto** **Docket Number:** 7846148 **Court:** [Specify Court, if known] **Date:** [Specify Date, if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Gypsum Resources, LLC - **Defendant:** Catherine Masto **Background:** Gypsum Resources, LLC is a company engaged in the exploration and development of gypsum mining resources. The company has been involved in legal disputes regarding its operational rights, permits, and potential land use associated with gypsum extraction. Catherine Masto, in her official capacity, represents the interests of the state regarding mineral resource management and land use policies. **Facts:** The case arose when Gypsum Resources, LLC challenged decisions made by Catherine Masto that affected its gypsum mining operations. The plaintiff alleged that actions taken by the defendant were detrimental to their mining operations, claiming that the regulatory decisions violated their rights regarding land use and mining permits. **Issues:** 1. Whether the actions taken by Catherine Masto infringed on the rights of Gypsum Resources, LLC. 2. The legality of the regulatory decisions and their compliance with relevant mining laws and state policies. **Court Proceedings:** The case was presented before the court, where both parties provided evidence and arguments supporting their positions. The plaintiff sought relief for what they deemed unjust restrictions and claims of impact on their business operations due to the defendant's regulatory actions. The defense contended that the decisions made were in accordance with state laws and aimed at safeguarding environmental and public interest. **Ruling:** [Pending or specify the ruling, if known] **Conclusion:** The case highlights the tension between private business interests in resource extraction and regulatory oversight from state authorities. The outcome will likely have implications for future mining operations in the region, the business practices of Gypsum Resources, LLC, and how such regulatory matters are navigated in the legal system. **Next Steps:** Further proceedings may follow based on the court's ruling, including potential appeals, negotiations, or a settlement between the parties involved. *Note: This summary is a speculative representation as specific details regarding the court's ruling and procedural history are not provided. The actual details may vary.*

Gypsum Resources, LLC v. Catherine Masto


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available