Legal Case Summary

Harris v. Superior Ct Maricopa


Date Argued: Fri Apr 18 2008
Case Number: 06-16416
Docket Number: 7852462
Judges:Hug, Schroeder, Callahan
Duration: 45 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Harris v. Superior Court of Maricopa County** **Docket Number:** 7852462 **Court:** Superior Court of Maricopa County **Date:** [Insert Relevant Date] **Overview:** In the case of Harris v. Superior Court of Maricopa County, the petitioner, Harris, sought relief from a decision made by the Superior Court. The case involved issues related to [insert primary legal issues or claims, e.g., family law matters, criminal proceedings, civil disputes, etc.], which are significant under Arizona law. **Facts:** - The petitioner, Harris, brought forth a legal challenge concerning [briefly summarize the key facts of the case, e.g., custody arrangements, criminal charges, civil claims, etc.]. - The Superior Court issued a decision on [insert decision date] that [describe the court's ruling or order, including any pertinent findings of fact or legal conclusions]. **Procedural Posture:** - Following the Superior Court's ruling, Harris filed a petition for [insert specific type of relief sought, e.g., review, rehearing, appeal, etc.]. - The case was subsequently brought before the appropriate appellate body/commission for consideration. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues addressed in this case included: 1. [Issue 1: Explain the first major legal issue or question.] 2. [Issue 2: Explain the second major legal issue or question.] 3. [Any additional issues that are pertinent to the case.] **Ruling:** The court ultimately [describe the decision made by the appellate court; did they affirm, reverse, or remand the original ruling?]. The ruling was based on [summarize the reasoning of the court, citing any applicable statutes, case law, or legal principles]. **Conclusion:** The outcome of Harris v. Superior Court of Maricopa County set a precedent for [discuss any implications of the ruling for future cases, legal interpretation, or the parties involved]. This case illustrates [summarize any broader relevance to legal practice or societal impact]. **Note:** For further details, one may refer to the court records or legal databases to obtain official documents and opinions pertaining to the case. --- Please modify any sections that require specific information related to the actual case details, such as dates, rulings, and issues involved.

Harris v. Superior Ct Maricopa


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available