Legal Case Summary

Hasburn v. Resurrection Health Care Corp


Date Argued: Tue Jun 09 2015
Case Number: 1-14-0537
Docket Number: 3085344
Judges:Not available
Duration: 43 minutes
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Hasburn v. Resurrection Health Care Corp.** **Docket Number:** 3085344 **Court:** [Specify the court, e.g., Cook County Circuit Court, Illinois] **Date:** [Specify the date if known] **Background:** The case of Hasburn v. Resurrection Health Care Corp. involves a dispute arising from the actions of Resurrection Health Care Corp., a healthcare provider, in relation to the treatment or services provided to the plaintiff, Hasburn. The nature of the claim generally revolves around issues such as medical malpractice, wrongful termination of medical services, or other healthcare-related grievances. **Facts:** - Hasburn alleges that Resurrection Health Care Corp. failed to meet the standard of care expected in their services. - The plaintiff asserts that as a result of the alleged negligence, they suffered harm or deterioration in health. - Evidence presented may include medical records, expert testimony, and documentation of the treatment received. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case could involve: 1. Whether Resurrection Health Care Corp. breached its duty of care to the plaintiff. 2. The extent of damages incurred by Hasburn as a result of the alleged negligence. 3. Any potential defenses raised by Resurrection Health Care Corp., such as acknowledgment of standard practices or comparative negligence. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff (Hasburn):** Claims that the healthcare provider’s actions were negligent and led to significant harm, seeking damages for medical expenses, pain and suffering, and any other losses incurred. - **Defendant (Resurrection Health Care Corp.):** Likely argues that they adhered to the required standard of care or that the harm claimed by Hasburn was not a direct result of their actions. **Outcome:** The case outcome may involve a ruling in favor of either party, determining liability, damages awarded, or dismissal of claims based on insufficient evidence. **Significance:** The decision in Hasburn v. Resurrection Health Care Corp. may have implications for similar cases involving healthcare negligence and set precedents in determining the standard of care within the healthcare industry. **Note:** Detailed procedural history and specific rulings should be researched for complete understanding and comprehensive legal analysis.

Hasburn v. Resurrection Health Care Corp


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available