Legal Case Summary

Helene Szajer v. City of Los Angeles


Date Argued: Wed Nov 03 2010
Case Number: 08-57010
Docket Number: 7846789
Judges:Zouhary, Goodwin, Rawlinson
Duration: 19 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Helene Szajer v. City of Los Angeles** **Docket Number:** 7846789 **Court:** [Specify Court, if applicable] **Filed:** [Specify Date of Filing] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Helene Szajer - **Defendant:** City of Los Angeles **Case Overview:** Helene Szajer filed a lawsuit against the City of Los Angeles, alleging [insert primary legal claims, e.g., negligence, violation of civil rights, etc.]. The case centers around [briefly describe the main issue or event that led to the lawsuit, such as an incident involving city services, municipal actions, etc.]. **Background:** - The plaintiff, Helene Szajer, claims that [provide more context about the plaintiff's situation or the specific incident that prompted the lawsuit]. - Szajer argues that the actions (or inactions) of the City of Los Angeles led to [describe the impact on Szajer, such as personal injury, property damage, etc.]. - [Include any relevant facts regarding communication between the parties, any prior incidents, or city policies that may be pertinent to the case.] **Legal Issues:** - The lawsuit raises several important legal questions, including: 1. [List key legal issues, such as the validity of claims under applicable laws, statutes of limitations, etc.] 2. [Additional legal claims or defenses raised by the defendant] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Arguments:** - Szajer contends that the City of Los Angeles failed to [describe the city’s alleged failure or wrongdoing] and that this negligence directly resulted in [describe the injury or damage]. - **Defendant’s Arguments:** - The City of Los Angeles has responded by [outline the city’s defense or counterarguments, such as sovereign immunity, adherence to regulations, or lack of evidence supporting the plaintiff’s claims]. **Current Status:** - The case is currently at [state the current procedural posture, such as awaiting trial, motions filed, settlement discussions, etc.]. - [Include any upcoming court dates or deadlines if known]. **Conclusion:** This case highlights the complexities involved in municipal liability and the legal responsibilities of city entities toward individuals. The outcome will potentially affect [discuss any implications for the community or broader legal principles]. **Notes:** - [Insert any additional notes or special considerations, such as media coverage or public interest.] **[End of Summary]** *Disclaimer: The details provided in this summary are for illustrative purposes only and do not reflect real events or actual legal proceedings.*

Helene Szajer v. City of Los Angeles


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available