Case Summary
**Case Summary: Helferich Patent Licensing, LLC v. The New York Times Company**
**Docket Number:** 2593211
**Court:** United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
**Date:** [Date of the decision]
**Background:**
Helferich Patent Licensing, LLC ("Helferich") filed a lawsuit against The New York Times Company ("The Times") for allegedly infringing on patents held by Helferich related to mobile content delivery systems. The patents at issue were designed to facilitate the delivery of electronic information and functionality to mobile devices, including features that allow users to access and navigate content efficiently.
**Legal Issues:**
The primary legal issue in this case revolved around whether The New York Times' mobile applications and services constituted an infringement of Helferich's patents. Specific allegations included the unauthorized use of patented methods of delivering content via mobile devices, which Helferich claimed were pivotal to the user experience of The Times' mobile platforms.
**Claims:**
Helferich sought damages for patent infringement, including compensatory damages for lost profits and requests for a preliminary injunction to prevent The Times from using the allegedly infringing technology while the case was active. Helferich argued that they had a right to enforce their patents and that The Times was aware of the patents’ existence yet continued to utilize the technology.
**The New York Times' Defense:**
The Times responded by denying the allegations of infringement. They asserted that their technology did not violate Helferich’s patents and raised defenses including invalidity of the patents, arguing that they were either obvious or lacked novelty. The Times also contended that the patents were unenforceable due to issues related to their prosecution and potential misuse.
**Court's Decision:**
The district court considered various factors, including the validity of Helferich's patents, the alleged infringement, and the relevance of any defenses raised by The Times. Ultimately, the court issued a ruling that addressed the claims of infringement and determined the applicability of the patents under current federal patent law.
**Outcome:**
The court's decision may have included a ruling in favor of either Helferich or The New York Times, potentially impacting the enforceability of the patents in question and the future of mobile content delivery systems. Damages awarded, if any, would likely depend on the court's assessment of the infringement's extent and the validity of the patents at issue.
**Significance:**
The outcome of Helferich Patent Licensing, LLC v. The New York Times Company could have had implications for patent holders and technology companies involved in mobile content delivery, particularly in relation to how patent rights are enforced in the rapidly evolving digital landscape.
**Note:** The specifics of the court's decision, including any awarded damages or injunctions, would need to be filled in with the actual verdict and ruling details from the case records.