Legal Case Summary

Hicks v. O'Fallon Shiloh Emergency Medical Services


Date Argued: Wed Jan 16 2019
Case Number: 5-18-0397
Docket Number: 13588752
Judges:Not available
Duration: 45 minutes
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Hicks v. O'Fallon Shiloh Emergency Medical Services** **Docket Number:** 13588752 **Court:** [Insert Court Name here] **Date:** [Insert Date of Filing or Ruling] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Hicks - **Defendant:** O'Fallon Shiloh Emergency Medical Services **Background:** The case involves a dispute between the plaintiff, Hicks, and the defendant, O'Fallon Shiloh Emergency Medical Services (OSEMS). The facts leading to the litigation revolve around an incident in which Hicks alleges negligence or failure to provide adequate medical care during an emergency situation. **Claims:** Hicks claims that OSEMS failed in their duty to provide appropriate emergency medical services, which resulted in harm or injury. The specific allegations may include: - Delay in response time - Inadequate medical assessment - Failure to transport promptly - Lack of proper medical equipment or personnel **Legal Issues:** The main legal issues in the case involve: 1. Whether OSEMS breached its standard of care in the provision of emergency medical services. 2. Determining if the breach of duty directly caused harm to Hicks. 3. Evaluating the defenses raised by OSEMS, such as qualified immunity or adherence to standard protocols. **Proceedings:** The case may have gone through various stages of litigation, including: - Discovery process, where both parties exchanged evidence and information - Pre-trial motions, where issues regarding admissibility of evidence and other procedural matters were resolved - A potential trial, where both sides presented their arguments before a judge or jury **Outcome:** The outcome of the case, including any verdicts, settlements, or jury awards, will depend on the evidence presented and the arguments made by both parties. The decision will hinge on the determination of whether OSEMS met or failed to meet the expected standards of emergency medical care under the given circumstances. **Significance:** This case may set a precedent in understanding the legal responsibilities of emergency medical services and the implications of negligence claims in healthcare. It will also highlight the importance of timely and competent emergency response in protecting patient welfare. **Note:** Since the specific details of the case, including the ruling and legal reasoning, are not provided, please check court records or legal databases for the most accurate and up-to-date information related to Hicks v. O'Fallon Shiloh Emergency Medical Services.

Hicks v. O'Fallon Shiloh Emergency Medical Services


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available