Legal Case Summary

Honeywell v. S.F.H.A


Date Argued: Mon Nov 03 2003
Case Number: 01-16618
Docket Number: 7860889
Judges:Thompson, Trott, Callahan
Duration: 12 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Honeywell v. S.F.H.A.** **Docket Number:** 7860889 **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Date:** [Insert Date of Decision] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** Honeywell International Inc. - **Defendant:** San Francisco Housing Authority (S.F.H.A.) **Background:** Honeywell International Inc. filed a lawsuit against the San Francisco Housing Authority (S.F.H.A.) concerning [insert brief overview of the nature of the dispute, e.g., a contract breach, proprietary technology issues, etc.]. The case arose from [insert context or events leading to the lawsuit]. **Facts:** - Honeywell alleged that [insert specific allegations made by Honeywell against S.F.H.A.]. - The S.F.H.A. countered that [insert any defenses or counterclaims put forth by the S.F.H.A.]. - The events leading to the conflict included [briefly outline significant events, agreements, or interactions between the parties that are relevant to the case]. **Issues:** The central legal issues in this case included: 1. [Insert first legal issue or question the court needed to resolve.] 2. [Insert second legal issue, if applicable.] 3. [Any additional issues that the court addressed.] **Ruling:** The court ultimately held that [insert the court’s decision, including whether it was in favor of Honeywell or S.F.H.A., and any relevant orders or directives the court gave]. **Reasoning:** In reaching its decision, the court considered [briefly outline the key legal principles or reasoning the court utilized]. The court analyzed [discuss any relevant statutes, case law, or legal standards that were pivotal in the ruling]. **Outcome:** As a result of the ruling, [insert the outcome for both parties, including any remedies awarded or actions ordered by the court]. **Conclusion:** This case highlights [insert relevant implications of the case, such as its significance in contract law, governmental obligations, technology use in public projects, etc.]. The ruling also sets a precedent for [discuss any broader legal implications]. **Notes:** For further details, refer to [insert any relevant citations or resources where additional information can be found, such as case law databases or legal journals]. --- Please note that many details would require further research or specifics that would be found in the court’s documentation or legal databases. The provided summary is a generalized template for constructing a case summary based on common legal reporting conventions.

Honeywell v. S.F.H.A


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available