Legal Case Summary

Hosetta Zertuche v. James Gleason


Date Argued: Thu Feb 11 2016
Case Number: 14-15047
Docket Number: 7835828
Judges:Schroeder, Nguyen, Adelman
Duration: 24 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Hosetta Zertuche v. James Gleason** **Docket Number:** 7835828 **Court:** [Specify the Court if known, e.g., District Court, State of [State], or Federal Court] **Date:** [Insert the date of the decision or filing] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** Hosetta Zertuche - **Defendant:** James Gleason **Case Background:** Hosetta Zertuche filed a lawsuit against James Gleason concerning [briefly describe the nature of the dispute, e.g., breach of contract, personal injury, civil rights violation, etc.]. The case involves allegations that [summarize the key facts leading to the legal action, including dates, events, and parties' actions]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues addressed in this case include: 1. [Issue 1, e.g., whether the defendant breached a duty owed to the plaintiff] 2. [Issue 2, e.g., determining the extent of damages, if applicable] 3. [Any other relevant legal issues] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Arguments:** Hosetta Zertuche contends that [summarize the plaintiff's claims and the legal basis for the lawsuit, including any statutes or precedents cited]. - **Defendant’s Arguments:** James Gleason argues that [summarize the defendant's defenses and counterarguments, including any relevant legal doctrines or evidence presented]. **Court Decision:** The court [describe the ruling, e.g., found in favor of the plaintiff, dismissed the case, etc.]. The decision was based on [briefly outline the reasoning of the court, including references to legal standards and any precedents]. **Outcome:** As a result of the ruling, [describe the consequences of the decision, such as compensation awarded, injunctions imposed, or legal precedents established]. **Implications:** This case may have implications for [discuss potential broader impacts, such as changes in legal standards, future case law, or effects on the involved parties]. **Conclusion:** The case of Hosetta Zertuche v. James Gleason highlights [summarize the significance of the case]. The ruling serves as a notable reference for [mention any particular legal principles or areas of law impacted by the case]. --- **Note:** Please insert specific details regarding the nature of the dispute, dates, and court decisions where indicated, as I do not have access to the actual case file or decision specifics.

Hosetta Zertuche v. James Gleason


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available