Case Summary
**Case Summary: Howard Zeringue v. Allis-Chalmers Corporation**
**Docket Number:** 4484645
**Court:** [Specify the court, e.g., Circuit Court, etc.]
**Date:** [Specify the date of the decision or filing]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Howard Zeringue
- **Defendant:** Allis-Chalmers Corporation
**Case Background:**
The case of Howard Zeringue v. Allis-Chalmers Corporation involves legal claims brought by the plaintiff, Howard Zeringue, against the defendant, Allis-Chalmers Corporation. The nature of the dispute typically revolves around issues such as product liability, personal injury, or breach of contract, commonly associated with manufacturing companies like Allis-Chalmers.
**Facts:**
1. Howard Zeringue alleged that he suffered injuries as a result of using a product manufactured by Allis-Chalmers Corporation.
2. The plaintiff claimed that the product was defective and that the defendant failed to provide adequate warnings about potential hazards associated with its use.
3. Zeringue sought compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages.
**Legal Issues:**
- The case primarily addressed whether Allis-Chalmers Corporation was liable for the alleged defects in the product.
- Key legal questions included the standard of care expected from manufacturers, the adequacy of the warnings provided, and whether the plaintiff's injuries were directly caused by the product's defects.
**Court's Findings:**
- The court examined evidence presented by both parties, including expert testimony on product safety standards and the specifics of the alleged defect.
- The ruling analyzed the extent of Allis-Chalmers Corporation's responsibility in ensuring product safety and proper warnings.
**Outcome:**
- [Include the court's decision, e.g., “The court found in favor of the plaintiff,” or “The court ruled in favor of Allis-Chalmers, dismissing the claims”]
- Potential implications for both parties and any orders given, such as payment of damages or changes in product labeling.
**Significance:**
This case highlights important aspects of product liability and the responsibilities of manufacturers to ensure the safety of their products. It provides insight into the legal standards applied in cases involving defective products and the measures that companies must take to avoid liability.
**Conclusion:**
Howard Zeringue v. Allis-Chalmers Corporation serves as a critical example of challenges faced by individuals seeking justice for injuries caused by defective products, as well as the legal obligations manufacturers have in safeguarding consumer safety.
**Note:** Specific details, such as dates and outcomes, should be filled in according to the actual case proceedings.