Case Summary
**Case Summary: Howle v. Aqua Illinois, Inc., Docket No. 3087174**
**Court:** Circuit Court of Illinois
**Filing Date:** [Insert Date]
**Judges:** [Insert Judges’ Names]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** [Plaintiff's Name - Howle]
- **Defendant:** Aqua Illinois, Inc.
**Background:**
In this case, the plaintiff, Howle, filed a lawsuit against Aqua Illinois, Inc., a water utility company, alleging several claims related to inadequate water service and damages resulting from the defendant's breach of duty. The complaint outlined issues related to service interruptions, water quality, and responsiveness to customer inquiries.
**Claims:**
Howle claimed that Aqua Illinois, Inc. failed to provide adequate water service as mandated by state regulations. Specific allegations included:
- Frequent service interruptions
- Failure to meet water quality standards
- Negligence in addressing customer complaints
- Seeking damages for inconveniences and possible health hazards caused by the service deficiencies.
**Defendant's Position:**
Aqua Illinois, Inc. denied the allegations, asserting that it adhered to all state and federal regulations regarding water service. The company argued that any service interruptions were due to unforeseen circumstances, such as severe weather or infrastructure issues, and were addressed promptly. They filed a motion to dismiss some or all of the claims, arguing that the plaintiff failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
**Court Proceedings:**
- The court held hearings on the motions filed by both parties, reviewing evidence, including service logs, maintenance records, and compliance reports.
- Key witnesses included water quality experts and company officials who testified regarding service protocols and incident responses.
**Decision:**
[Insert the Court's ruling or outcome, including if any claims were dismissed or if the case proceeded to trial, and the final determination made by the court.]
**Significance:**
The case highlights important issues regarding accountability for public utility providers, the standards required for water service delivery, and the legal recourse available to individuals dissatisfied with service quality. The outcome may have implications for other utility companies and how regulatory compliance is monitored and enforced.
**Conclusion:**
Howle v. Aqua Illinois, Inc. serves as a significant case in the realm of utility service litigation, emphasizing the responsibilities of service providers and the rights of consumers. Further developments in the case should be monitored for their impact on utility regulations and consumer protections.
**Note:** Specific details such as dates, judges' names, and the final ruling should be filled in with accurate case information as it becomes available.