Legal Case Summary

Hung Lam v. City of San Jose


Date Argued: Thu Jun 15 2017
Case Number: 16-16052
Docket Number: 6075228
Judges:Fisher, Schroeder, N.R. Smith
Duration: 35 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Hung Lam v. City of San Jose** **Docket Number:** 6075228 **Court:** [Specify applicable court, e.g., United States District Court, Northern District of California] **Date:** [Provide relevant date of the ruling or filing] **Background:** Hung Lam filed a lawsuit against the City of San Jose, asserting claims related to [insert specific legal claims or issues, such as civil rights violations, administrative procedure issues, etc.]. The case arose from [describe the facts leading to the lawsuit, including any actions taken by the city that prompted the plaintiff’s complaint]. **Facts:** 1. **Plaintiff:** Hung Lam 2. **Defendant:** City of San Jose 3. **Incident:** The plaintiff alleges that [provide details about what happened, including dates, events, and any interactions with city officials or entities]. 4. **Claims:** The plaintiff's claims include [list claims, such as constitutional violations, discrimination, failure to follow city regulations, etc.]. **Procedural History:** After filing the complaint in [insert date], the City of San Jose responded with [insert type of response, e.g., a motion to dismiss, answer, etc.]. The case proceeded through discovery, during which [briefly describe any relevant motions filed or decisions made by the court]. **Issues:** The main legal issues before the court included: 1. [Issue 1] 2. [Issue 2] 3. [Any additional issues] **Ruling:** The court [describe the court's decision, including any findings or conclusions reached regarding the claims]. The court’s ruling focused on [summarize the rationale behind the decision and reference relevant legal standards or interpretations]. **Outcome:** The court [granted/denied] the plaintiff’s request for [insert relief sought, such as damages, injunctive relief, etc.]. In conclusion, the court emphasized [summarize any critical points made by the court regarding the ruling and its implications]. **Significance:** This case is significant as it highlights [insert any broader implications for civil rights, municipal governance, or other relevant areas]. It may serve as a precedent for similar future cases involving [mention any relevant legal principles or issues]. **Conclusion:** The case of Hung Lam v. City of San Jose demonstrates the ongoing legal challenges faced when seeking accountability from municipal entities. The resolution of this case will likely influence future interactions between citizens and local governments regarding [insert relevant theme]. (Note: Ensure to locate and insert missing specific details about the court, date, and detailed legal claims for factual accuracy.)

Hung Lam v. City of San Jose


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available