Legal Case Summary

Hunt-Golliday v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n


Date Argued: Thu Jun 16 2016
Case Number: 1-15-1709WC
Docket Number: 3082800
Judges:Not available
Duration: 38 minutes
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Hunt-Golliday v. Workers' Compensation Commission, Docket No. 3082800** **Court:** [Specify Court if known] **Date:** [Specify Date if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Hunt-Golliday - **Defendant:** Workers' Compensation Commission **Background:** Hunt-Golliday filed a claim for workers' compensation benefits asserting that she sustained injuries while on duty. The specific circumstances surrounding the injury included [briefly describe the incident, e.g., the nature of the work, how the injury occurred]. The Workers' Compensation Commission (WCC) was tasked with evaluating the claim and determining the validity of Hunt-Golliday's assertions regarding her injury and eligibility for benefits. **Issues:** The main issues presented in this case included: 1. Whether the injuries sustained by Hunt-Golliday occurred in the course of her employment. 2. Whether the evidence presented sufficiently established a causal link between the employment activities and the injuries claimed. 3. The appropriateness of the benefits awarded by the Workers' Compensation Commission based on the findings. **Findings:** The WCC conducted a thorough investigation including hearings, review of medical records, and testimonies from Hunt-Golliday as well as her employers and any relevant witnesses. The Commission ultimately found that: - Hunt-Golliday’s injuries were indeed sustained in the course of her employment. - Sufficient evidence was presented to establish a causal relationship between her work duties and the injuries claimed. - The determination by the Commission regarding her eligibility for benefits was consistent with existing workers' compensation laws. **Conclusion:** The Commission ruled in favor of Hunt-Golliday, granting her the workers' compensation benefits she sought. The decision affirmed the recognition of her injuries as work-related and acknowledged the need for compensation for medical expenses and lost wages stemming from the incident. **Implications:** This case underscores the importance of clear documentation and evidence in workers' compensation claims. It highlights the standards of proof that must be met by employees seeking benefits and affirms the role of the Workers' Compensation Commission in adjudicating such disputes. **Note:** For more specific details such as citations, legal reasoning, or further implications, additional context from court documents or legal databases may be necessary.

Hunt-Golliday v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available