The New Year's Eve 7-1125 paper for the first season of the school. Mr. Greenfield, good morning here. Welcome to the court. Thank you, good morning, Dr. Lee for seeing you. May I please the court? This is an annual term of grants on our government line. Two and three conditions before us are one, what are two of Google's products and pay-pay-pay references? And two, whether one of those two products and pay-payments, comment first, four minutes, or two of these compliments, each issue received an overview, and Google's not seeing a firmness of the court taking some kind of instructions. A week from the grant, the demonstrates the most stark example of the favorable location for a patient-pointing of debt should also be paid into that pay-point. Both the tokens of the defendant's auto link are akin to a patient identification of the firm, and it has preferred violence
. However, a patient identification of the firm would never be as attention-crossing for us, would never be used as a data reference and tap points because this far too broad, not yours, I'll direct you to the intrinsic record, column 22-298, starting at 11-13. But other DRs would include, and those could be a patient's identification of the firm, a-1952. Well, four below the right could include the output tokens and that's the issue that the patient members are likely, but this leads to the opposite, including four of these requests and patient-pointing. Mr. Wings, you can come, probably for one aspect of the patient, who is that the judge took the data of the reference definition from the crack between two and one? The judge was also the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, which was, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was the judge, and the judge was reasonable and got into的是 with a And in the context of this entire record that means is that an SQL address for a record capital address is still be simply an address for a data references in the defense of record and a person who's still the record will certainly be aware that an SQL record will address the SQL address for a record capital address for a record capital address for a record or on the in the fact is an admission and I should have had something earlier. Well that's what's known as an issue of different than this one is always holds the better than you. I see it in my role, but I think there's this discussion. This one always holds the better. The reason why they say the invention is this, the invention is that, the narrow interpretation
. Here's an example where with great technological detail, the half of the sense that the invention quote, they also use the case of a proxy surfer that will do it. Which draws the direct demand to request someone to end up in the license. So if there's parity that holds the answer back to the invention, it's right, that's the correct answer. The single record concept was important as a major rotation by the district court. The answer is no, when you transit record, the figure 14, city, the 14, city, the city is have all of the 20 honest issues, one data records used to form these two completely separate political backgrounds. So let's go to the sequence over to multiple data records. I've all the time that sequence over to multiple data records and just one single data record. In, well, 5% question, the 5% 7 packet and it comes through by the 36th shows the example, time varies right. So that was, that is the characteristic where the exact records were 35 data records
. Not only one at time, but the change in sequence is over time. And that was concentrated and called the data records. Well, usually followed the question. The ISDN, any data point? The ISDN number would be the data records, is that? No, one that essentially turned back to the absurd identification within that absurd record, directly, only directly, I would be in record port to another record of the query. The, the that process is described by Greece and the ISDN information goes to the Google TV process server, the Google TV process server, you scratch that out of your essence and then creates what's called a redirect, the URL, the output of the ISDN numbers content, there's a template that I'll do that. And that redirect the URL, the server, the growing TV process, the back to the users' data, the other one's line, where upon users' data will redirect the web page off to the percent of the language on the Google. Thank you. Mr. Chairman, welcome
. Welcome. Good morning. Good morning. Thank you, Mr. Court. We'll be again with the best-guarrettous question. I'll provide a definition of three-point-on-patch, not a flyer, but this should. There are a couple of meetings for that. Another one is that it is a definition, and it will lead to that
. I could raise a direct, the second position, which you are applying on the golden case, and I have not even thought about how it can be useful for courses, as I'm going to do with these facts. Are you referring to Colony line, which is 30 to 39, that's the text that you say can be used to read the authority of the definition of data records? That's what the judge quotes. Yes, he said yes, he said yes, but in that paragraph, we'll take a second sentence. It says, quote, in the context of a medical facility, an exemplary DRVV as simple as quote, medication given and quote, ECG report also in quotes, or admission NMR, heart-feet and quote. Now, for example, when is this medication given? If I go to the hospital, there are five days to each day at the given, the different medication, there would be five medication given records. In my case, one for each day. So, given the SATA reference, is the phrase medication given, it would refer only one report, it would refer to five reports. So, I'm not sure how this paragraph supports the third, when he can student the data records to mean that it refers to only a single record, because then it would refer to multiple records, like a five medication, or much to response to the couple of points from the first of all. If you actually look at the course of the claim construction, the construction itself isn't limited to a one-to-one course
. It's a quote from one data record to a single reference record. According to what you were doing to that claim construction, not the opinion that I evaluated, the opinion that Jeff said, that I have a chance of these claims to actually require a single specific record. And this is a perspective, which is some variation among the claims you're out of, and I said that if you look at, for example, claims one and 91 of the 321 half, we think those claims are going to be single specific record. Other claims that use the data reference claim are probably not enough. So, we're not taking the position that every claim uses the data reference claim, which are equivalent to what requires this one-to-one course response. But, the additional response, which I think is most important, is that it doesn't have it. Because whether you say the first one record or to a handful of records, the point is it has to refer to a record, at least a given record. And what the district worked on at least a set of the ones that you're not in a set, is that Google's promise don't refer to any of them. So, when you say it's one, we have to claim the structure of the first one, or a few years, or so
. So, I'm really suggesting that the data reference to the phrase being construed, that's directly identified the record itself in EKG, or the amount of record being possible. The right-winged, this whole issue of a proxy server really is, again, incitable. No one is saying that a genealogy of inter-graph can be linked between a phrase in the first record, any ant-specific records, for sure, to be able to go through a proxy server, and it goes through a number of methods. The important point is, though, the transfer of the system that it poses at order and structure on disparate databases. The system has to know that the reference computer in the first record, easing the fact that it records to another record, some place else. And the system has to be knowing that, knowing that the transfer record system can find that record. When we say that the system needs to know that the second record, the medication record, record for the patient, for example, actually exists. Yes. So, then how do we see how the system could know that? Well, the system knows whether there is a medication record or several medication records for a given patient
. The system knows the type of record that it says, so that it sees, for example, catheterization report that phrase in a document. It says, it looks like that, regularization, it says, how is it recognized? Because, you know, what it is, it recognizes that there are such reports for some patients, but for a given patient, it doesn't know that there is a relevant report in that pattern. Well, that's right. And let it go, so look for a catheterization report for a particular patient who does a catheterization report. But it knows exactly where to look. See, that's the whole point of this dimension. It knows where a catheterization report is restored. It looks format of the addresses of the variables for the first person supposed to be. So, it knows where a little bit of that sort of sector, right? Maybe very simple, that's true
. Maybe there's more to come. That's the future, too. But where it is in is the dispute between you and the other side of this claim is coming. Well, did they say that the system doesn't need to know whether the medication reports such as catheterization report that exactly exactly. That is the rule system's work because both when you look at auto and you look at access, particularly auto is the best example. The system is queers. The browser computer is queerious in structure, which is a question or a command to a rule server. The rule server, I find that, to another query which is held within the setbacks of third-party side of the now. Obviously, we're hoping there's a relevant information there that is returned, but ultimately you don't know
. And there's no dispute, those are query strings there. They are structurally well, they try to find information that no one really knows exactly what's there or whether it's there. They say that's really not. The data reference, clearly, is a word or phrase to one doubt, even, that is used in a process of looking for related information. So effectively, our view of technically leads to data reference. The distinction between references that ask questions or give a command on the money in, if you say they're not covered. And references that describe a particular type of report that they have for the position. Yes, because we think both the plain meaning and the actual data reference is certainly the meaning of this use in these patterns. This reference means it has to refer to something that you know, at least like category, what it is, it's not the same as saying, well gee, I recognize this word, authorization report. Let's proceed with my topic that is related to the success that is related to that phrase. That's a very different thing. It's really not the pattern that it refers to. That's our two queries. Yes. That seems to be an end to scope of these protected inventions. And you have a little attention between saying that and you're saying, well queries are outside scope of the pattern. But different things. And with all the respect that they did, this argument doesn't seem to my phrase much shorter without telling you what a SQL query is
. Let's proceed with my topic that is related to the success that is related to that phrase. That's a very different thing. It's really not the pattern that it refers to. That's our two queries. Yes. That seems to be an end to scope of these protected inventions. And you have a little attention between saying that and you're saying, well queries are outside scope of the pattern. But different things. And with all the respect that they did, this argument doesn't seem to my phrase much shorter without telling you what a SQL query is. That's just a way of getting the piece of data out of the database. That's the first of all, you know, what do you see the queries from the outside scope. So there's a difference between that sort of query and the kind of query that your systems do. Yes. Yes. And in this state, we're reading two different things with queries. It's not the all-query part outside of the pattern. This is the end of a technical query. Well, the asset and the more the point, whether you're querying your own, your own, the Eastern home database that you control, as you know, has these records
. That's just a way of getting the piece of data out of the database. That's the first of all, you know, what do you see the queries from the outside scope. So there's a difference between that sort of query and the kind of query that your systems do. Yes. Yes. And in this state, we're reading two different things with queries. It's not the all-query part outside of the pattern. This is the end of a technical query. Well, the asset and the more the point, whether you're querying your own, your own, the Eastern home database that you control, as you know, has these records. And you remember in a rules case, whether you find a bottle of it, or you talk assets, the ultimate database is to wish a hybrid-based poison. There are no big cases. We don't store any information to you about how to store it. So, in your setting, and for the patterned inventions of these four certain patents, in every case, that data reference has to refer to some source of records that's controlled by, or owned by, on the premises of the Eastern-Duduition running assistant. So, that doesn't happen. A code will be speaking, that's the physical location of the data, of course, the database is to be anywhere in the world. But, that control, that control, that will apply the entity that's running the system. That's very interesting. We had Google, none of the control, these entities, all there, UPS or Amazon or something
. And you remember in a rules case, whether you find a bottle of it, or you talk assets, the ultimate database is to wish a hybrid-based poison. There are no big cases. We don't store any information to you about how to store it. So, in your setting, and for the patterned inventions of these four certain patents, in every case, that data reference has to refer to some source of records that's controlled by, or owned by, on the premises of the Eastern-Duduition running assistant. So, that doesn't happen. A code will be speaking, that's the physical location of the data, of course, the database is to be anywhere in the world. But, that control, that control, that will apply the entity that's running the system. That's very interesting. We had Google, none of the control, these entities, all there, UPS or Amazon or something. I was like, where are you going to go? I was like, where are you going to go? To the enemy? Right. So, in the case of, we're saying a lot of these examples, when the A8 and A8 word phrases recognized in the document, and a URL gets constructed at that point, that uses part of that word and a bunch of other stuff that Google fills in. That query will be sent from a user's computer. This is a process in the device they say, or the claim. It's sent from a user's computer, off to a separate Google server. The Google server gets that query and it starts out some of the information and creates 100 queries, which is different. They're not the same thing. That manager can't have this one at once. The next map to users browser, I mean, it's a reader map
. I was like, where are you going to go? I was like, where are you going to go? To the enemy? Right. So, in the case of, we're saying a lot of these examples, when the A8 and A8 word phrases recognized in the document, and a URL gets constructed at that point, that uses part of that word and a bunch of other stuff that Google fills in. That query will be sent from a user's computer. This is a process in the device they say, or the claim. It's sent from a user's computer, off to a separate Google server. The Google server gets that query and it starts out some of the information and creates 100 queries, which is different. They're not the same thing. That manager can't have this one at once. The next map to users browser, I mean, it's a reader map. As soon as the browser takes that, and basically, it takes that, and sends it back out to the third card, the Amazon. The Amazon, you hear exactly. The Amazon server takes that query, it starts out some of the information, and again, it actually does so. There is a lot of us to do with it. Now, we think Google takes, we have a pretty good idea, some of the things to do with it. That's why we get all of us on the direct people to look there, and they can get some really info. But ultimately, what hands down returns by page shape return? We don't know how we stored the data, we don't know the fact that they're actually, we don't know what the server really knows, how that data is going to contain the random information, we're having to correct it. Correct. It's made by hands, and it's not a query, we can do that
. As soon as the browser takes that, and basically, it takes that, and sends it back out to the third card, the Amazon. The Amazon, you hear exactly. The Amazon server takes that query, it starts out some of the information, and again, it actually does so. There is a lot of us to do with it. Now, we think Google takes, we have a pretty good idea, some of the things to do with it. That's why we get all of us on the direct people to look there, and they can get some really info. But ultimately, what hands down returns by page shape return? We don't know how we stored the data, we don't know the fact that they're actually, we don't know what the server really knows, how that data is going to contain the random information, we're having to correct it. Correct. It's made by hands, and it's not a query, we can do that. That's right. And that's really the way all of us, but you know, distributed databases out of the web, it's the way we're all done today, we're all done in real time, and it's all the queries, because no one controls either, also, the system, not even Google, and so on. So I'm asked, why did the algorithm, like, that, and the same, as their data reference, maybe query, because the web is available within that data image? Well, because they aren't querying in the sense, it's a different, they aren't querying in the sense of, gee, do we have any information that's even related to this keyword? They know, right, the whole point of these patents is that there isn't word and structure, opposed by the system administrator, right, the person who sets up the database, so they know in the case of a particular keyword, that there are reference of that sort in system, and now when you know that there are reference of that sort, we know exactly where they're stored, and how they're stored. So, you know, you may still, as a matter of convenience, you may address those in various ways, you may address a few of processor, you may address them using the query, but the point is, they exist, they preexist, the system, those that are there, and it's the correspondence between the reference over here, and the multiple and record over here, or just to the end, or the gate, to the end. I actually a little bit on address format, we didn't really talk about any particular phases of the mark, so I will go into the data list, or it has questions on that particular issue, I want to make just a lot of information on that, and you'll back and look at it, that even if you accept the fact that these various URLs are somehow address-format, the address-format claims require that you look at the first URL, and compare it to the, to the whatever you are aware of, is that actually addresses the database and can enter the process. So, it's the beginning and the end that's required by the point, because the plain sake of processing device has to create that first address for them, and kind of refers to the processing device, and our system is the browser and the computer. The browser and the computer only creates the first URL, does not create second, remember that's done at the Google server, so it's going to see about that, does not create third, actually, in the case of Google Maps, does not create the fourth. There's no dispute that you compare that first URL to the ultimate URL for different handles, and in fact, every phrase has to be tried to earn through that the first one to last one of our common. So, that's the end of the common address-format points
. That's right. And that's really the way all of us, but you know, distributed databases out of the web, it's the way we're all done today, we're all done in real time, and it's all the queries, because no one controls either, also, the system, not even Google, and so on. So I'm asked, why did the algorithm, like, that, and the same, as their data reference, maybe query, because the web is available within that data image? Well, because they aren't querying in the sense, it's a different, they aren't querying in the sense of, gee, do we have any information that's even related to this keyword? They know, right, the whole point of these patents is that there isn't word and structure, opposed by the system administrator, right, the person who sets up the database, so they know in the case of a particular keyword, that there are reference of that sort in system, and now when you know that there are reference of that sort, we know exactly where they're stored, and how they're stored. So, you know, you may still, as a matter of convenience, you may address those in various ways, you may address a few of processor, you may address them using the query, but the point is, they exist, they preexist, the system, those that are there, and it's the correspondence between the reference over here, and the multiple and record over here, or just to the end, or the gate, to the end. I actually a little bit on address format, we didn't really talk about any particular phases of the mark, so I will go into the data list, or it has questions on that particular issue, I want to make just a lot of information on that, and you'll back and look at it, that even if you accept the fact that these various URLs are somehow address-format, the address-format claims require that you look at the first URL, and compare it to the, to the whatever you are aware of, is that actually addresses the database and can enter the process. So, it's the beginning and the end that's required by the point, because the plain sake of processing device has to create that first address for them, and kind of refers to the processing device, and our system is the browser and the computer. The browser and the computer only creates the first URL, does not create second, remember that's done at the Google server, so it's going to see about that, does not create third, actually, in the case of Google Maps, does not create the fourth. There's no dispute that you compare that first URL to the ultimate URL for different handles, and in fact, every phrase has to be tried to earn through that the first one to last one of our common. So, that's the end of the common address-format points. Then, finally, if I may, Dr. Rufugles, this didn't come up, but it might not come up, but, because I understand that the phrase is argument-bound, and it agrees, they are going to a few paragraphs of the constant declaration, the extra-securation. We've played it up, this is the high level of the declaration, there's no, there's no recluxury, there's no particularized argument, when you test it all, you get an out of the addition of the addition. But, even if I were for that, that's what my kind of discussion says. Even if I were for a map, I would be able to find if you look at those paragraphs, they would lie at click-through-freezes claim and searching, and not the course claim and searching. So, if you read the statistical claim and searching, it's correct. The ABC points you look at, but it's just to be valid. Then, you, as you read, I just wanted to give a couple of points and then make some clear little questions. Point number one is, was it sure that the reliance on the claim lines of the beginning of Mr
. Then, finally, if I may, Dr. Rufugles, this didn't come up, but it might not come up, but, because I understand that the phrase is argument-bound, and it agrees, they are going to a few paragraphs of the constant declaration, the extra-securation. We've played it up, this is the high level of the declaration, there's no, there's no recluxury, there's no particularized argument, when you test it all, you get an out of the addition of the addition. But, even if I were for that, that's what my kind of discussion says. Even if I were for a map, I would be able to find if you look at those paragraphs, they would lie at click-through-freezes claim and searching, and not the course claim and searching. So, if you read the statistical claim and searching, it's correct. The ABC points you look at, but it's just to be valid. Then, you, as you read, I just wanted to give a couple of points and then make some clear little questions. Point number one is, was it sure that the reliance on the claim lines of the beginning of Mr. Arthur, who said, A second record, so therefore it must be somehow low to the system of Arthur, a common control system. I was for a very broad, page 12 of our library, where we cite three motion fitness versus sidest, 2005 Federal Surgeons, Civil War Discourse, rejected the notion that use of the singular as claiming articles necessarily that the now, can only be equivalent to number one. The second point I would like to address is Mr. Scherberbach's comment that all the patents in this family somehow have pre-knowledge or have a pre-embershame where the records are, bad days, this all right, and it's somehow an interpretation of the claim-likeable system that doesn't know exactly the records, and this will be excluded. I'm sorry if they should be our delivery. We point out that the parent forced his one patent, who was actually an earlier file, had an argument that it's great to be in the claim-division, that's earlier on. The forced his one patent was invasive, this argument, because it says that, A143, column 11, starting line one, that links a new form that they stuck in the book, without even knowing whether those reports were in existence. I mean, I can't think of anything more contrary to positional, such as your problem. Well, depending on whether you're talking about an individual report or patient's shell's medication, or whether you're talking about a thank-you report or all patient's name, the medication reports
. Arthur, who said, A second record, so therefore it must be somehow low to the system of Arthur, a common control system. I was for a very broad, page 12 of our library, where we cite three motion fitness versus sidest, 2005 Federal Surgeons, Civil War Discourse, rejected the notion that use of the singular as claiming articles necessarily that the now, can only be equivalent to number one. The second point I would like to address is Mr. Scherberbach's comment that all the patents in this family somehow have pre-knowledge or have a pre-embershame where the records are, bad days, this all right, and it's somehow an interpretation of the claim-likeable system that doesn't know exactly the records, and this will be excluded. I'm sorry if they should be our delivery. We point out that the parent forced his one patent, who was actually an earlier file, had an argument that it's great to be in the claim-division, that's earlier on. The forced his one patent was invasive, this argument, because it says that, A143, column 11, starting line one, that links a new form that they stuck in the book, without even knowing whether those reports were in existence. I mean, I can't think of anything more contrary to positional, such as your problem. Well, depending on whether you're talking about an individual report or patient's shell's medication, or whether you're talking about a thank-you report or all patient's name, the medication reports. I don't know if that's the idea, but you have a question about that. I'm sorry. It was a quick question. So I want to move that out. More comments to say about how the address was. That's it. That's good. Thank you very much, John. All right
. Thank you both, Councilor. We'll take the appeal and the very question