Legal Case Summary

Hypertouch, Inc. v. Azoogle.com, Inc.


Date Argued: Tue Apr 13 2010
Case Number: 09-15943
Docket Number: 7847773
Judges:Moody, Schroeder, Smith N. R.
Duration: 34 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Hypertouch, Inc. v. Azoogle.com, Inc.** **Docket Number:** 7847773 **Court:** [Specific court details, if available, e.g., United States District Court] **Date:** [Specific date of the decision or filing, if available] **Overview:** Hypertouch, Inc. filed a lawsuit against Azoogle.com, Inc., claiming [briefly outline the main legal claims, e.g., breach of contract, fraud, etc.]. The dispute centers around [provide a brief description of the underlying issue, such as business dealings, partnerships, or digital marketing practices]. **Facts:** 1. Hypertouch, Inc. and Azoogle.com, Inc. entered into an agreement for [describe the nature of the agreement or any relevant contractual obligations]. 2. Hypertouch alleges that Azoogle engaged in [specific actions that Hypertouch claims are wrongful, such as failure to comply with the terms, engaging in deceptive practices, etc.]. 3. [Include any important dates, communications, or events leading up to the lawsuit.] **Legal Issues:** The case primarily involves the following legal questions: - Whether Azoogle.com breached contractual obligations owed to Hypertouch, Inc. - [Any other relevant legal theories, such as tort claims, negligence, or statutory violations.] - Whether Hypertouch suffered damages as a result of Azoogle's actions. **Court's Analysis:** The court analyzed the evidence presented, including [mention any key evidence, documents, or witness testimony]. The court focused on: - The interpretation of the contract and obligations of both parties. - The actions taken by Azoogle and whether they constituted a breach under applicable law. - Assessing the claimed damages and the relevance of evidence provided by both parties. **Conclusion:** The court ultimately ruled [summarize the court's decision, e.g., granting a motion for summary judgment, dismissing the case, etc.]. This decision [briefly describe the implications of the ruling for the parties involved and any broader significance it may have in the legal landscape or industry standards]. **Further Actions:** Following the ruling, [if there are any subsequent actions such as appeals or settlements, mention them here]. **Keywords:** Hypertouch, Azoogle.com, breach of contract, legal dispute, damages, litigation. (Note: Ensure the specifics about the case (details, date, court) are accurate and filled in as necessary, as actual case specifics may vary.)

Hypertouch, Inc. v. Azoogle.com, Inc.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available