Case Summary
**Case Summary: Ilicia Perez v. Loretta E. Lynch**
**Docket Number:** 3047474
**Court:** United States Court of Appeals
**Date:** [Insert relevant date]
**Overview:**
Ilicia Perez filed a case against Loretta E. Lynch, the former Attorney General of the United States, in a dispute concerning immigration proceedings and the application of relevant legal standards. The case raises important issues regarding the status of individuals in removal proceedings and their rights under U.S. immigration law.
**Facts:**
1. Ilicia Perez, a citizen from [insert country of origin], faced removal proceedings initiated by the Department of Homeland Security.
2. The basis for the removal was [insert specific reasons for removal].
3. During the proceedings, Perez argued that she was eligible for relief based on [insert type of relief, e.g., asylum, cancellation of removal].
4. The immigration judge ruled against Perez, leading her to appeal the decision.
**Issues:**
1. Whether the immigration judge appropriately assessed the evidence presented by Ilicia Perez related to her eligibility for relief from removal.
2. The interpretation and application of relevant immigration statutes affecting the case.
**Ruling:**
The appellate court reviewed the case, scrutinizing both the factual determinations made by the immigration judge and the legal standards applied. The court aimed to clarify the extent to which the lower court's decision adheres to established precedents and the proper application of immigration law.
**Conclusion:**
The outcome of the case significantly impacts Ilicia Perez’s status in the United States and sets a precedent for similar cases involving individuals seeking relief from removal. The ruling will contribute to the evolving landscape of immigration law and the rights of individuals within the removal process.
**Note:** Specific details, including dates, key arguments, and the appellate court's ruling, would need to be filled in based on actual court records and findings.