Legal Case Summary

Ilyas Khrapunov v. Pavel Prosyankin


Date Argued: Thu Dec 20 2018
Case Number: 18-16254
Docket Number: 8444192
Judges:Callahan, N.R. Smith, Murguia
Duration: 46 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Ilyas Khrapunov v. Pavel Prosyankin** **Docket Number:** 8444192 **Court:** [Specify Court Name] **Filing Date:** [Specify Date] **Case Overview:** In the case of Ilyas Khrapunov v. Pavel Prosyankin, petitioner Ilyas Khrapunov brought a legal action against respondent Pavel Prosyankin. The specifics of the case involve [briefly describe the nature of the dispute, e.g., contractual issues, tort claims, etc.]. **Background:** Ilyas Khrapunov, [insert brief background about the petitioner, including relevant facts that explain their position], alleged that Pavel Prosyankin [insert facts about the respondent and their actions that led to the dispute]. The crux of the case centers around [summarize the main legal issues involved, such as breach of contract, negligence, or other relevant claims]. **Key Issues:** 1. **[Issue 1: Describe the first key legal issue or question raised in the case]** 2. **[Issue 2: Describe the second key legal issue or question]** 3. **[Additional issues as applicable]** **Arguments:** - **Petitioner's Arguments:** Ilyas Khrapunov's legal team argued that [summarize the main arguments made by Khrapunov, including any relevant statutes or case law cited to support their case]. - **Respondent's Arguments:** Pavel Prosyankin's defense focused on [summarize the main points made by Prosyankin in response, including counter-arguments and legal principles they relied on]. **Court's Ruling:** The court [insert the court’s decision, such as ruling in favor of either party, dismissing the case, or ordering a specific remedy]. The ruling was based on [outline the reasoning behind the court's decision, referencing applicable laws, precedence, and how the facts of the case were interpreted]. **Conclusion:** The judgment in the case of Ilyas Khrapunov v. Pavel Prosyankin serves to clarify [mention the implications of the ruling, any broader legal principles established, and potential impact on similar future cases]. [Any further proceedings or appeals that may be indicated]. **Next Steps:** Following the ruling, [discuss any potential next steps for either party, including appeals, compliance with court orders, or further legal action]. [Note: Additional details, such as specific dates, court rulings, and in-depth analysis, can be inserted as needed based on the actual case content and context.] **Disclaimer:** This case summary is a simplified overview and should not be considered a comprehensive legal analysis or opinion. Legal counsel should be consulted for specific advice related to any case.

Ilyas Khrapunov v. Pavel Prosyankin


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available