Legal Case Summary

In re Commitment of Butler


Date Argued: Tue Apr 30 2013
Case Number: 1-11-3606
Docket Number: 3084888
Judges:Not available
Duration: 63 minutes
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois

Case Summary

**Case Summary: In re Commitment of Butler (Docket No. 3084888)** **Court:** [Specify Court Name if known] **Docket Number:** 3084888 **Case Type:** Commitment Hearing **Parties Involved:** - Petitioner: [Name of the petitioner, e.g., State or individual] - Respondent: Butler (full name if known) **Background:** The case concerns the legal commitment of Butler, an individual alleged to be mentally ill and a danger to themselves or others. The proceedings were initiated following concerns about Butler’s mental health and behavior, leading to an evaluation of whether involuntary commitment is warranted under the relevant mental health statutes. **Facts:** - The petitioner filed for commitment on the grounds that Butler exhibits signs of severe mental illness, poses a risk to themselves or others, and requires treatment that cannot be provided in a less restrictive setting. - Evidence presented during the hearing may include testimony from mental health professionals, family members, and law enforcement regarding Butler’s behavior, mental state, and any previous incidents of self-harm or aggression. - Assessments may also include recent medical evaluations and observations from facilities that have previously treated Butler. **Legal Issues:** - The main legal issue revolves around the definitions of mental illness and dangerousness under the applicable mental health laws. - The court must determine whether there is clear and convincing evidence that Butler is mentally ill and poses a danger to themselves or others. **Outcome:** The court’s decision in this case will hinge on the interpretation of the evidence presented regarding Butler’s mental state and the necessity for commitment according to statutory requirements. If the court finds in favor of the petitioner, Butler may be ordered into a psychiatric facility for treatment. Conversely, if the evidence does not support commitment, Butler will be released. **Significance:** This case highlights the delicate balance between individual rights and the state’s responsibility to protect public safety and provide necessary medical intervention for individuals with mental illnesses. **Next Steps:** - Await the court's ruling on the petition for commitment. - If the commitment order is granted, further proceedings will follow regarding the type and duration of treatment necessary for Butler. **Note:** Additional details regarding the specific dates, parties, and evidence presented would be included as available from court records.

In re Commitment of Butler


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available