Case Summary
**Case Summary: In re Marriage of Ahle (Docket Number 3091149)**
**Court:** [Insert appropriate court name]
**Docket Number:** 3091149
**Parties Involved:**
- Petitioner: [Name of the petitioner, e.g., John Ahle]
- Respondent: [Name of the respondent, e.g., Jane Ahle]
**Background:**
The case involves the dissolution of marriage between John and Jane Ahle. The couple had been married for [insert duration of marriage], and they are seeking a resolution regarding the distribution of assets, child custody, and support arrangements. The proceedings were initiated by the petitioner, who filed for divorce on [insert filing date].
**Issues:**
1. Division of marital property
2. Child custody and visitation rights
3. Child support obligations
4. Spousal support (if applicable)
**Facts:**
- The parties were married on [insert marriage date].
- They have [number and ages of children] together.
- During the marriage, the couple acquired various assets, including [list significant assets, such as real estate, financial accounts, etc.].
- Disputes arose regarding the value and division of these assets as well as the parenting plan for their children.
**Court Proceedings:**
During the hearings, the court evaluated evidence presented by both parties, including financial documents, testimony regarding the family dynamics, and analyses of child custody factors. The petitioner argued for [insert key argument of the petitioner], while the respondent countered with [insert key argument of the respondent].
**Ruling:**
The court ultimately issued a ruling based on the evidence presented, focusing on the best interests of the children and equitable division of marital property. The orders included:
- [Briefly outline the ruling regarding property division]
- [Summarize child custody arrangement]
- [Highlight child and/or spousal support obligations]
**Conclusion:**
The dissolution of the marriage between John and Jane Ahle culminated in a framework for asset distribution and a parenting plan that aims to support the well-being of their children. The court’s decision reflects an effort to balance both parties' interests while prioritizing the welfare of the minor children involved.
**Note:** Specific names, dates, and factual details are necessary to complete this summary. Please consult the case files for comprehensive information.