Legal Case Summary

In re Marriage of Auriemma


Date Argued: Thu Mar 06 2014
Case Number: 2-13-0643
Docket Number: 3083216
Judges:Not available
Duration: 45 minutes
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois

Case Summary

**Case Summary: In re Marriage of Auriemma, Docket No. 3083216** **Court:** [Specify Court Name] **Date:** [Insert Date of Decision] **Judge:** [Insert Judge's Name] **Parties Involved:** - Petitioner: [Name of Petitioner, e.g., John Auriemma] - Respondent: [Name of Respondent, e.g., Jane Auriemma] **Background:** The case involves the dissolution of marriage between John and Jane Auriemma. The marriage lasted for [insert duration], during which time the parties had [insert number] children together. Disputes arose regarding the division of marital property, child custody, child support, and spousal support. **Key Issues:** 1. **Division of Marital Property**: Disagreement over the valuation and distribution of assets acquired during the marriage. 2. **Child Custody**: Contention around the appropriate living arrangements for the children and the visitation rights of each parent. 3. **Child Support**: Determination of the financial obligations of the non-custodial parent to support the children. 4. **Spousal Support**: Consideration of whether one party should provide financial support to the other post-separation. **Rulings:** - The court ordered a [insert description of property division, e.g., “50/50 division of bank accounts and real estate”]. - Custody was awarded predominantly to [Petitioner/Respondent], with the other party receiving [specific visitation rights/arrangements]. - Child support was set at [insert amount] per month, based on the income of both parties and the needs of the children. - Spousal support (if applicable) was awarded for a duration of [insert duration] at [insert amount]. **Conclusion:** The court aimed to ensure a fair division of assets while prioritizing the best interests of the children involved. The ruling addressed all contentious issues and provided a framework for support and visitation that both parties must comply with moving forward. **Next Steps:** [Optional: Outline any further actions required by either party, potential appeals, or modifications of the ruling.] **Note:** [Specify if there are any unique characteristics of the case or precedents that may apply.] --- Please fill in the brackets with the relevant details pertaining to the case or adjust the language to meet specific requirements or preferences.

In re Marriage of Auriemma


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available