Case Summary
**Case Summary: In Re Marriage of Carter (Docket Number 3087650)**
**Court:** (Specify the court if available, e.g., Family Court, Circuit Court)
**Date:** (Specify the date of the decision if available)
**Judges:** (List the judges involved if available)
**Background:**
This case involves the dissolution of marriage between the parties, identified as Carter. The couple had been married for [insert duration of marriage] and had [insert number] children from their union. The proceedings were initiated by [insert name], who filed for divorce on [insert date].
**Issues:**
The primary issues in this case centered around the division of marital property, child custody arrangements, child support, and alimony. Both parties raised concerns over the best interests of the children and the equitable distribution of assets acquired during the marriage.
**Procedural History:**
The case was heard in [insert court name], where both parties provided evidence and testimony related to their respective claims. Preliminary hearings addressed temporary custody and support orders. Following mediation efforts, which were unsuccessful, the case proceeded to trial.
**Findings of Fact:**
The court found that:
1. The parties shared [insert relevant assets, e.g., a family home, savings accounts, etc.].
2. The couple’s children were primarily raised by [insert relevant parent] during the marriage.
3. Both parents had the ability to provide for the children’s needs, although discrepancies in income and employment stability existed.
**Conclusion:**
The court ultimately issued a ruling that:
- Granted joint custody of the children, with [insert name] designated as the primary custodial parent.
- Ordered [insert name] to pay child support in the amount of [insert amount].
- Divided marital assets equitably, awarding [insert specific assets or financial settlement].
- Determined that alimony was not warranted given the self-sufficiency of both parties.
This decision aimed to protect the best interests of the children while ensuring a fair distribution of assets and responsibilities between the parties.
**Aftermath:**
Both parties have the right to appeal this decision to [insert relevant appellate court] if they believe the ruling was unjust or improperly interpreted.
---
Please adjust any specific details according to the actual information available in the case file or records, as I do not have access to the actual case details.