Case Summary
**Case Summary: In re Marriage of Humbles (Docket No. 3087882)**
**Court:** [Specify court if known]
**Docket Number:** 3087882
**Date:** [Specify date if known]
**Parties Involved:**
- Petitioner: [Name of Petitioner]
- Respondent: [Name of Respondent]
**Background:**
The case involves the dissolution of marriage between the Petitioner and Respondent. The marriage was marked by [briefly mention important elements such as duration, children involved, significant events, etc.]. Disputes arose over several issues including the division of marital assets, custody of children, and spousal support.
**Key Issues:**
1. **Division of Marital Assets:** The parties contested the equitable distribution of their marital property, which included real estate, financial accounts, and other assets accumulated during the marriage.
2. **Child Custody and Support:** Another significant area of contention was the custody arrangement for their children, including the determination of primary custody and child support obligations.
3. **Spousal Support:** The Petitioner sought [or the Respondent sought] spousal support, raising questions about the financial needs of the lower-earning spouse and the standard of living established during the marriage.
**Court Findings:**
The court, after reviewing evidence and testimonies from both parties, issued rulings on each of the contested issues. Key findings included:
- **Asset Division:** The court determined a fair division of the parties' assets, taking into account contributions made by both spouses, financial circumstances, and the needs of any children involved.
- **Custody Arrangement:** The court granted [primary custody to one party, joint custody, etc.], prioritizing the best interests of the children. Necessary arrangements for visitation and support were also established.
- **Spousal Support:** The court awarded [amount or ruled against spousal support], considering factors such as duration of the marriage, income levels, and future earning potential of both parties.
**Conclusion:**
The court’s rulings aimed to ensure a fair resolution for both parties while considering the well-being of any children. The case illustrates the complexities involved in divorce proceedings, particularly regarding asset distribution, child custody, and support obligations. The final order provided mechanisms for enforcement and modification should circumstances change in the future.
**Note:** This case summary is a general outline and may require specific details based on actual court records and findings.