Legal Case Summary

In re Marriage of Stegeman


Date Argued: Tue Sep 22 2015
Case Number: 4-15-0396
Docket Number: 3083851
Judges:Not available
Duration: 47 minutes
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois

Case Summary

**Case Summary: In re Marriage of Stegeman, Docket No. 3083851** **Court:** [Insert Name of Court Here] **Date:** [Insert Decision Date Here] **Judges:** [Insert Judges' Names Here] **Parties Involved:** - **Petitioner:** [Insert Name] - **Respondent:** [Insert Name] **Background:** In re Marriage of Stegeman involves the dissolution of a marriage between [Petitioner Name] and [Respondent Name]. The case was initiated when [Petitioner/Respondent - specify which party] filed for divorce on [insert filing date]. The couple had been married for [insert length of marriage] and had [insert number of children, if applicable]. **Issues:** The primary issues in this case included: 1. Division of marital property and debts. 2. Custody arrangements for the children (if applicable). 3. Child support and alimony payments. 4. Any allegations of misconduct or irregularities impacting the proceedings. **Rulings:** The court addressed each issue as follows: 1. **Marital Property Division:** The court determined the equitable distribution of marital assets, including [list significant assets]. The court upheld [Petitioner/Respondent]’s claim to [specific property] while granting [Petitioner/Respondent] [another property or sum]. 2. **Custody Arrangements:** The court awarded [insert custody type - sole/joint] custody to [Petitioner/Respondent] based on [brief rationale, such as the best interest of the children]. 3. **Child Support:** Monthly child support payments were set at [insert amount] based on the income of [Petitioner/Respondent]. 4. **Alimony:** The court determined that alimony was appropriate/inappropriate, setting payments at [insert amount or duration, if applicable]. 5. Any allegations of misconduct were addressed through [insert court’s findings regarding allegations, if included]. **Conclusion:** The court finalized the divorce decree, outlining the responsibilities of both parties moving forward. The court emphasized [any significant remarks or recommendations made by the judges]. This judgment is intended to provide a clear framework for [Petitioner] and [Respondent] as they move forward post-marriage. **Significance:** This case highlights [insert significance, such as important precedents set or particular issues emphasized in the ruling], contributing to the interpretation of family law in similar cases within the jurisdiction. **Next Steps:** Either party may appeal this decision within [insert time frame for appeal] if they believe there are grounds for such action. The court also provided guidance on future compliance and adjustments regarding support payments and custody arrangements. (End of Case Summary) *Note: Ensure to fill in any specific information as applicable. If docket details are limited, the case summary may require adaptation based on available information.*

In re Marriage of Stegeman


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available