Case Summary
**Case Summary: In re Marriage of Wright v. Hartmann, Docket Number 4114115**
**Court:** [Insert Court Name, e.g., Superior Court of California]
**Docket Number:** 4114115
**Decision Date:** [Insert Decision Date]
**Background:**
The case of In re Marriage of Wright v. Hartmann involves a legal dispute arising from the dissolution of marriage between the parties, Wright and Hartmann. The case primarily revolves around issues of asset division, child custody, and spousal support.
**Facts:**
Wright and Hartmann were married on [insert date of marriage] and separated on [insert date of separation]. The couple has [insert number and ages of children, if applicable]. During their marriage, they acquired various assets, including [insert description of significant assets, such as real estate, vehicles, or business interests]. After their separation, disagreements arose regarding the equitable distribution of these assets, child custody arrangements, and support obligations.
**Legal Issues:**
1. Determination of the community vs. separate property in the asset division.
2. Awarding of child custody and visitation rights.
3. Calculation and determination of spousal support.
**Rulings:**
The court analyzed the contributions of both parties to the marriage, including financial and non-financial contributions, to ascertain the community property. The court ruled on the division of assets based on [insert rationale related to community property laws or other relevant legal principles].
In terms of child custody, the court emphasized the best interests of the children, leading to the decision regarding custody arrangements and visitation schedules. The court took into account factors such as each parent's living situation, relationship with the children, and ability to provide a stable environment.
Regarding spousal support, the court assessed the financial needs of the requesting party, the ability to pay of the other party, and the duration of the marriage to arrive at the appropriate amount and duration of support.
**Conclusion:**
The court issued its final ruling, outlining the division of assets, the custodial arrangement for the children, and the conditions for spousal support. The decision aimed to ensure fairness and uphold the welfare of any minor children involved. The judgment served as a pivotal resolution to the marital dissolution, established legal precedents for similar future cases, and provided clarity on the obligations of both parties post-marriage.
**Note:**
For further details on the court's reasoning and legal precedents cited, please refer to the full court opinion or formal documentation related to this case.