Case Summary
**Case Summary: Intel Corp v. Negotiated Data**
**Docket Number:** 2599725
**Court:** [Specify the court if known, e.g., United States District Court, Northern District of California]
**Date:** [Specify the date of the decision or case filing if known]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Intel Corporation
- **Defendant:** Negotiated Data, Inc.
**Background:**
Intel Corporation, a leading semiconductor manufacturer, initiated legal action against Negotiated Data, a data management and analytics company. The dispute arose from allegations of breach of contract and misuse of proprietary information. Intel claimed that Negotiated Data had failed to adhere to the terms of a licensing agreement regarding the use of Intel's technology and know-how.
**Facts:**
- Intel entered into a licensing agreement with Negotiated Data to allow the latter to utilize certain proprietary technologies for data analytics applications.
- Intel alleged that Negotiated Data used the licensed technology beyond the agreed-upon scope, leading to unauthorized products being sold to third parties.
- Negotiated Data contended that their usage of the technology was within the contractual boundaries and raised defenses related to interpretation of the licensing terms.
**Legal Issues:**
1. Whether Negotiated Data breached the licensing agreement with Intel.
2. Whether Intel's claims for damages were justified and appropriately quantified.
3. Interpretation of the licensing terms and conditions related to the use of proprietary technology.
**Court's Analysis:**
The court examined the language of the licensing agreement, focusing on clauses related to permitted use and restrictions. It considered evidence from both parties, including expert testimony regarding industry standards and practices.
**Ruling:**
The court ruled in favor of Intel Corporation, finding that Negotiated Data indeed breached the licensing agreement by exceeding the agreed scope of use. The ruling included an injunction barring Negotiated Data from further use of Intel's technologies outside of the terms of the agreement. Additionally, the court awarded damages to Intel for losses incurred due to the breach.
**Conclusion:**
This case underscores the importance of clearly defined terms in licensing agreements and the legal protections afforded to proprietary technology. The ruling emphasized that companies must adhere strictly to contractual obligations, and breaches can lead to significant legal repercussions.
**Implications:**
The decision may have implications for other technology firms regarding the enforcement of licensing agreements and how proprietary information is handled in contractual relationships. Companies engaged in tech licensing are reminded to clearly define usage parameters and monitor compliance to avoid similar disputes.
[Note: For more specific details, including relevant statutes, jurisdiction, and citation, additional research may be required.]