Legal Case Summary

Itella Foods, Inc. v. Northern INS.


Date Argued: Mon Mar 29 2004
Case Number: 02-56383
Docket Number: 7860133
Judges:Dw Nelson, Fernandez, Kleinfeld
Duration: 49 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Itella Foods, Inc. v. Northern Insurance** **Docket Number:** 7860133 **Court:** [Specify court, if known; e.g., United States District Court, etc.] **Date:** [Include date of the decision or relevant dates if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Itella Foods, Inc. - **Defendant:** Northern Insurance **Background:** Itella Foods, Inc. filed a lawsuit against Northern Insurance, seeking recovery for damages related to an insurance claim. The dispute arose when Itella Foods alleged that Northern Insurance failed to provide coverage and compensation for claims submitted under their insurance policy. **Key Issues:** 1. Whether the terms of the insurance policy between Itella Foods and Northern Insurance covered the claimed losses. 2. The validity of the claims made by Itella Foods under the policy. 3. Any defenses raised by Northern Insurance regarding the denial of the claims. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Argument:** Itella Foods contended that the losses incurred were clearly covered under the terms of their insurance policy with Northern Insurance. They argued that Northern Insurance had a contractual obligation to compensate them for the losses and that its refusal to pay constituted a breach of contract. - **Defendant’s Argument:** Northern Insurance countered that the losses claimed by Itella Foods fell outside the scope of the coverage specified in the insurance policy. They presented evidence and reasoning to justify their denial of the claims, including potential exclusions outlined in the policy. **Court’s Decision:** [Insert the court's ruling, whether it favored Itella Foods, Northern Insurance, or if there was a settlement. Also include any significant legal precedents or statutes cited in the decision.] **Conclusion:** This case underscores the complexities involved in insurance claims and the importance of clearly defined policy terms. The court’s ruling will have implications for both parties, particularly regarding the interpretation of insurance contracts and the obligations of insurers to their clients. **Note:** The details provided above may need to be tailored based on the specific ruling and context of the case, as well as the jurisdiction in which the case was heard. Please incorporate any additional pertinent details or legal principles as necessary.

Itella Foods, Inc. v. Northern INS.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available