Case Summary
**Case Summary: Iv'Leania Parker v. Carolyn W. Colvin**
**Docket Number:** 4469359
**Court:** United States District Court
**Date:** [Date of Decision]
**Background:**
Iv'Leania Parker filed a lawsuit against Carolyn W. Colvin, the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (SSA). The case revolves around Parker's claim for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits, which she contends were wrongfully denied by the SSA.
**Facts:**
Parker applied for SSDI benefits, asserting that she was unable to work due to a variety of medical conditions. After her application was denied at the initial level, Parker requested a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). During the hearing, evidence was presented regarding her medical history, work experience, and the impact of her impairments on her daily life. The ALJ ultimately ruled against Parker, leading her to appeal the decision to the district court.
**Issues:**
The primary issue in this case is whether the ALJ’s decision to deny Parker SSDI benefits was supported by substantial evidence and whether the correct legal standards were applied in evaluating her disability claim.
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff (Parker):** Parker argued that the ALJ failed to adequately consider her medical records, testimonies regarding her limitations, and the cumulative effect of her disabilities. She contended that the ALJ's decision was not supported by substantial evidence and that her rights were violated due to a lack of proper consideration of her condition.
- **Defendant (Colvin):** Colvin, representing the SSA, argued that the ALJ applied the appropriate legal standards and that substantial evidence supported the denial of benefits. Colvin maintained that Parker's impairments did not meet the SSA's criteria for disability.
**Court's Analysis:**
The district court reviewed the case under the standard that requires the ALJ's findings to be supported by substantial evidence. This includes evaluating whether the ALJ properly considered all relevant medical evidence, followed the correct legal standards, and provided a clear rationale for the decision.
**Outcome:**
[Insert Court's ruling, e.g., The court affirmed the decision of the ALJ, finding that there was substantial evidence to support the denial of benefits, or The court reversed the ALJ's decision and remanded the case for further proceedings.]
**Conclusion:**
The outcome of this case highlights the challenges faced by claimants seeking SSDI benefits, particularly regarding the burden of proof required to establish disability under the Social Security Administration’s criteria. It underscores the importance of thorough documentation and representation in administrative hearings.
**Note:** Actual outcomes and dates should be inserted where applicable. Modify this summary further to fit any additional details specific to the case or jurisdiction.