Legal Case Summary

Jackie King v. Mary Berghuis


Date Argued: Thu Oct 10 2013
Case Number: 12-1486
Docket Number: 4443510
Judges:Not available
Duration: 34 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Case Summary

Case Summary: Jackie King v. Mary Berghuis Docket Number: 4443510 Court: [Specify Court, e.g., U.S. District Court, Michigan; Michigan Court of Appeals, etc.] Date of Decision: [Specify Date] Parties Involved: - Plaintiff: Jackie King - Defendant: Mary Berghuis Overview: The case of Jackie King v. Mary Berghuis revolves around issues that arise in the context of [specify the legal issue, e.g., civil rights, housing, employment dispute, etc.]. Jackie King, the plaintiff, brings forth charges against Mary Berghuis, the defendant, alleging [briefly summarize the claims made by the plaintiff]. Facts: - Jackie King alleges that [provide a brief summary of the events leading up to the legal action, including relevant facts and details pertinent to the case]. - The plaintiff contends that [elaborate on the specific grievances or claims made by the plaintiff against the defendant]. - The defendant, Mary Berghuis, responds by [summarize the defense's argument or response to the claims made by the plaintiff]. Legal Issues: The primary legal issues addressed in the case include [list the main legal questions that the court had to consider, such as interpretation of statutes, application of legal precedents, or constitutional questions]. Court’s Analysis: - The court analyzed the claims presented by Jackie King against the legal framework applicable to the case. - The court considered [summarize any important legal standards or precedents that were referenced in the court's decision]. - Key arguments from both the plaintiff and defendant were evaluated in light of the evidence presented. Decision: The court ruled in favor of [indicate which party won the case]. The decision [summarize the outcome or ruling of the court, any damages awarded, injunctions issued, or orders given]. Significance: This case is significant because [explain the implications of the ruling for future cases, its impact on the law, or any broader societal relevance]. Conclusion: The ruling in Jackie King v. Mary Berghuis underscores [summarize the main takeaway from the case, particularly in relation to the legal principles involved]. This case serves as a notable reference for future litigation regarding [specify the broader issue highlighted by the case]. (Note: Please replace placeholders with specific information from the actual case as needed.)

Jackie King v. Mary Berghuis


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available