Case Summary
**Case Summary: Jackson County Bank v. Mathew Dusablon**
**Docket Number:** 8495363
**Court:** (Specify court name, e.g., Circuit Court of Jackson County)
**Date:** (Specify date of filing or decision)
### Background:
In the case of Jackson County Bank v. Mathew Dusablon, the plaintiff, Jackson County Bank, initiated legal proceedings against the defendant, Mathew Dusablon, regarding a financial dispute. The case arose from allegations suggesting that Dusablon had defaulted on a loan secured through the bank, leading to claims of breach of contract and requests for repayment of the outstanding debt.
### Key Facts:
- **Parties Involved:**
- Plaintiff: Jackson County Bank
- Defendant: Mathew Dusablon
- **Nature of the Case:** Breach of contract / Debt recovery
- **Loan Details:** The dispute centered around a specific loan agreement made between Dusablon and the bank, which included terms related to repayment, interest rates, and security interests.
- **Default Allegations:** The bank claimed that Dusablon failed to meet the repayment terms outlined in the loan agreement, resulting in financial losses for the institution.
### Legal Issues:
- Determination of default: Whether Dusablon did indeed default on the loan.
- Recovery of funds: Jackson County Bank sought recovery of principal and accrued interest.
- Defenses: Any defenses raised by Dusablon regarding the validity of the loan agreement or circumstances surrounding the alleged default.
### Court's Findings:
- The court examined evidence, including loan documentation, payment records, and any communications between the parties related to the loan.
- The court evaluated Dusablon’s arguments against the claims of default, considering any possible mitigating circumstances or defenses presented.
### Conclusion:
The court ruled in favor of Jackson County Bank, finding that Mathew Dusablon had indeed defaulted on the loan agreement as claimed. The ruling mandated Dusablon to repay the outstanding debt along with applicable interest and possibly other related costs.
### Implications:
This case emphasizes the importance of adhering to loan agreements and the legal consequences of defaulting on financial obligations. It serves as a reminder to individuals and financial institutions alike about the necessity of clear contracts and timely payments in banking relationships.
### (Note: Please adjust the date, court name, and any other specific details as necessary, as the case information provided here is fictional and lacks specific elements.)