Legal Case Summary

Jacqueline Hurst v. District of Columbia


Date Argued: Fri Dec 09 2016
Case Number: 15-1410
Docket Number: 4573302
Judges:Allyson K. Duncan, G. Steven Agee, Pamela A. Harris
Duration: 25 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Jacqueline Hurst v. District of Columbia** **Docket Number:** 4573302 **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., Superior Court of the District of Columbia] **Date:** [Specify Date] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Jacqueline Hurst - **Defendant:** District of Columbia **Background:** Jacqueline Hurst filed a lawsuit against the District of Columbia, claiming [insert the nature of the dispute, e.g., wrongful termination, discrimination, personal injury, etc.]. The plaintiff alleges that the District of Columbia failed to adhere to [insert applicable laws, regulations, or duties], resulting in harm to Hurst. **Factual Allegations:** The plaintiff alleges that [insert details of the event or situation that led to the lawsuit, including dates, locations, and any relevant actions or omissions by the District of Columbia]. Hurst claims that the actions of the District were [insert what the plaintiff believes were unlawful, negligent, or harmful], which has caused [discuss the impact on Hurst, such as emotional distress, financial loss, etc.]. **Legal Issues:** The legal issues at stake involve [insert the specific legal questions, e.g., whether the District of Columbia violated certain statutes, whether Hurst's claims are actionable under the law, etc.]. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Arguments:** Hurst contends that the District of Columbia [insert key arguments made by the plaintiff, including violations of laws or rights]. - **Defendant’s Arguments:** The District of Columbia may argue that [insert potential defenses or counterarguments made by the defendant, such as lack of jurisdiction, absence of a legal duty, etc.]. **Court Proceedings:** The case was filed on [insert filing date] and has gone through [insert any major procedural events, e.g., motion to dismiss, discovery disputes, trial proceedings, etc.]. The court is tasked with determining [insert what the court is determining, such as whether to grant summary judgment, go to trial, etc.]. **Outcome:** As of [insert date of last known update], the outcome of the case is [insert outcome if available, e.g., case dismissed, verdict in favor of plaintiff/defendant, settlement, etc.]. The implications of this ruling may affect [insert potential broader implications for Hurst, the District, or similar cases]. **Conclusion:** This case exemplifies [insert any relevant commentary on the significance of the case, its impact on public policy, legal precedent, etc.]. Further developments will be closely monitored as they may set important precedents regarding [insert relevant legal principles or community implications]. **Note:** For specific details regarding the case outcome and any additional legal analyses, please refer to official court documents or legal databases.

Jacqueline Hurst v. District of Columbia


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available