Case Summary
**Case Summary: Jacquelyen Derry v. Nancy Berryhill, Docket No. 8390319**
**Court:** United States District Court
**Date:** [Insert Date of Decision]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Jacquelyen Derry
- **Defendant:** Nancy Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
**Overview:**
Jacquelyen Derry filed a complaint against Nancy Berryhill, acting in her capacity as the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (SSA). The case involves a dispute over the denial of Social Security disability benefits, with Derry asserting that the administrative decision was not supported by substantial evidence and that her rights to due process were violated.
**Background:**
The plaintiff, Jacquelyen Derry, applied for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits, claiming she was unable to work due to various medical conditions. After an administrative hearing, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) denied her application, leading Derry to appeal the decision, arguing that the ALJ failed to properly consider her medical records and the impact of her disabilities on her ability to work.
**Legal Issues:**
1. Whether the ALJ's decision to deny Derry's SSDI benefits was supported by substantial evidence.
2. Whether the ALJ properly applied the relevant legal standards in assessing Derry's medical condition and functional limitations.
3. Whether Derry's due process rights were violated during the administrative proceedings.
**Decision:**
The Court ruled in favor of Derry, holding that the ALJ’s decision lacked substantial evidence. The Court found that the ALJ failed to adequately consider key medical evidence and did not sufficiently assess Derry’s residual functional capacity. As a result, the Court reversed the ALJ's decision and remanded the case for further proceedings, instructing the SSA to reconsider Derry's application in light of the evidentiary shortcomings identified in the decision.
**Conclusion:**
This case highlights the importance of thorough and accurate consideration of medical evidence in Social Security disability determinations. The ruling reaffirmed the rights of claimants to have their applications evaluated fairly and with due regard for their medical conditions, thus safeguarding their entitlement to benefits under the Social Security Act.
**Docket Number:** 8390319
**Note:** Always refer to court records or official documents for the most accurate and detailed information regarding legal cases.