Legal Case Summary

James Adkins v. Paul Suba


Date Argued: Thu Jun 13 2013
Case Number: 11-17543
Docket Number: 7837580
Judges:Farris, Nelson, Nguyen
Duration: 36 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: James Adkins v. Paul Suba** **Docket Number:** 7837580 **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Date:** [Insert Relevant Dates] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** James Adkins - **Defendant:** Paul Suba **Background:** The case involves a dispute between James Adkins and Paul Suba, centered around [insert relevant background information regarding the nature of the dispute, such as contractual obligations, personal injury claims, property issues, etc.]. **Facts:** 1. James Adkins initiated legal action against Paul Suba alleging [briefly outline the claims made by the plaintiff, such as breach of contract, negligence, etc.]. 2. [List key events that led to the dispute, such as specific incidents or interactions between the parties]. 3. The plaintiff claims [summarize the plaintiff’s arguments, evidence presented, and any other relevant details]. 4. In response, Paul Suba [summarize the defendant’s arguments, defenses raised, and evidence presented]. **Issues:** The primary legal issues presented in the case include: - [Issue 1: Define the main legal question or issues involved in the dispute] - [Issue 2: Define any additional legal questions] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Argument:** James Adkins maintains that [elaborate on the plaintiff's main arguments, including legal precedents or statutes relied upon]. - **Defendant’s Argument:** Paul Suba contends that [elaborate on the defendant's rebuttal, defenses, and counterarguments]. **Court’s Analysis:** [Summarize how the court analyzed the arguments. Include any relevant legal standards, precedence, or statutes that were considered in the decision-making process. Highlight any findings of fact or conclusions of law by the court.] **Outcome:** [State the verdict or decision made by the court. If applicable, include any awards, sanctions, or orders issued by the court.] **Significance:** This case highlights [discuss the broader implications of the case, any legal principles established or reinforced, and the impact on the parties involved or similar future cases]. **Conclusion:** The ruling in James Adkins v. Paul Suba serves as a key example of [insert concluding remarks that summarize the implications of the decision, any lessons learned, and potential future developments in similar cases]. [Note: Add specific details related to the court’s ruling, any appeals, and follow-up action if needed. Make sure to research and ensure accuracy regarding the facts and legal principles involved in the case.]

James Adkins v. Paul Suba


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available