Case Summary
**Case Summary: James Coleman v. Jeh Johnson, Docket No. 4550260**
**Court:** [Specify Court Name]
**Date Filed:** [Insert Filing Date]
**Date Decided:** [Insert Decision Date]
**Parties:**
- **Plaintiff:** James Coleman
- **Defendant:** Jeh Johnson, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security
**Background:**
James Coleman filed a lawsuit against Jeh Johnson, who was the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) at the time of filing. The case involves issues related to immigration and the application of federal laws governing the status of individuals within the United States.
**Facts:**
- The plaintiff, James Coleman, contends that he was adversely affected by a decision or action taken by the DHS, which may involve matters related to immigration enforcement, immigration status, or the procedures of the agency.
- Coleman claims that the actions taken by the DHS under Johnson's leadership were unjust, discriminatory, or did not comply with established legal standards.
**Legal Issues:**
- The case primarily revolves around the interpretation and application of immigration laws and policies administered by the DHS.
- Potential issues include questions of due process, administrative procedures, and the rights of the individual in the context of federal immigration authority.
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff's Argument:** Coleman likely argues that the DHS violated his rights through improper procedural conduct or by failing to adhere to the legal standards that govern the immigration process.
- **Defendant's Argument:** Jeh Johnson, representing the DHS, would contend that the actions taken were within the scope of legal authority and complied with relevant laws and regulations.
**Decision:**
- The resolution of the case would address whether the plaintiff's claims hold merit and whether the DHS's actions were justifiable under the law.
- Depending on the court's findings, the decision may either uphold the DHS's actions or mandate corrective measures to address the issues raised by Coleman.
**Impact:**
- The outcome of this case could have implications for how immigration policies are enforced and could set precedents regarding the rights of individuals in immigration-related proceedings.
(Note: Please fill in the specific court name, filing date, and decision date as these details were not provided in the initial request.)